I suppose I should start with this:
“Why should I care
if Jackson was murdered?”
Or if orphans are raped?
Or if Northrop
cheated
the US military?
Or if Natalie Holloway was sold
as a sex slave?
|
|
1) Ignoring crime allows it
to thrive
Ignoring crime is like ignoring a tick in your hair, or ignoring a
fire at your neighbor's house. If Jackson was murdered, then ignoring this
crime is allowing the criminals to continue their operation. As the children
would say, "Duuhhh!" |
|
2) We can learn important
lessons from crimes
By analyzing crimes and people's
reaction to crimes, we can learn about how the criminals operate,
and we can learn about human behavior. This in turn can give us ideas on
how to make improvements to society.
For
example, did you know that there are thousands
of victims of the 9/11 attack who are still alive but who are suffering
health problems because they breathed some of the microscopic metal particles
that were created when the buildings were demolished?
During 2005, Jimmy Walter paid for a series of 9/11 events in Europe,
and when me and Christopher Bollyn were walking out of the lobby of our
hotel in Spain we encountered two Americans, one of whom became covered
with dust on the day of the 9/11 attack. He told us that when he tried
to wash the dust off, it felt as if it was cutting into him, like pieces
of glass, and he said he suffered from terrible skin problems for many
months afterwards.
I told him that the reason it felt like broken glass is because the
dust was full of pieces of pulverized glass windows, computers, and concrete,
and the dust also contained hundreds of pulverized firemen and thousands
of other people. And I told him that the dust may have harmed his overall
health.
Bollyn and I explained a lot about the 9/11 attack to him, and we invited
him to our free 9/11 meeting that evening. But he never showed up,
and he never showed any interest in what we were telling him. His reaction
to learning that the buildings were demolished with explosives was essentially:
"Oh, OK. That explains it."
|
|
|
One of the important lessons to learn from the 9/11 victims is that
most of them don't care why they are
suffering health problems, and they don't have any desire to expose or
destroy the crime network. All they want is some money
to help cover their medical bills! This is exactly how animals behave!
A dog can be beaten over and over, but it continues to love its owner.
Likewise, the US military is abused over and over by businesses,
Israel, and government officials, but most of the men in the military ignore
the abuse. Most people around the world are also ignoring the abuse that
is occurring with our banking and financial systems, and most people are
ignoring the corruption in police departments and school systems. And the
German people have been abused to an incredible extent by Jews, but so
far most of them show no concern that they have been lied to about the
Holocaust and the world wars.
Most people don't care about society, and most don't even care about
themselves!
Their primary concern is satisfying their emotional cravings for food,
sex, status, and babies. They don't think much about the future, and they
don't try to learn from past mistakes. Instead, they exist from one day
to the next, just like a stupid animal.
The one million Germans that Eisenhower put into a vacant field and
let slowly die did nothing
to help themselves. |
|
|
|
What if Jackson died a "natural"
death?
If you spend your time reading this article, and months later
we discover that Michael Jackson died a natural death, will you have
wasted
your time? No, because the issues I bring up are important regardless
of whether he died naturally or was murdered. There are a lot of lessons
to learn by looking at Michael Jackson's life and death, and a lot of issues
that we ought to be discussing. For some examples:
Why allow Kings and
Queens?
The
world has a lot of incredibly wealthy people, but how does any society
benefit by treating some people like kings and queens? How does a society
benefit by providing a few individuals with phenomenal mansions, private
jets, and giant yachts?
Furthermore, how do the rich people
benefit? Was Michael Jackson's life happier
because of his giant "Neverland" mansion and ranch? It seems to me that
he had a very sad and lonely life. As with other famous and wealthy people,
he was constantly surrounded by criminals
and parasites, constantly dealing with
lawsuits and lawyers, and too famous to mingle with the rest of us. I have
the feeling that he was actually sad and lonely.
The justification for allowing people to become phenomenally wealthy
is that it provides us with an incentive
to work, but as I described in other documents and audio files, this philosophy
is false... at least for some of us.
It is true that many people won't do much of anything unless they are under
some type of pressure, or unless there is some type of reward held out
in front of them, but why should we design society for those crude people?
Why not classify those people as circus animals
or as primitive savages?
The
people who won't contribute to society unless they can become phenomenally
rich should be classified as dogs who
belong on a racetrack chasing after a mechanical bone. We should not
design society for such crude people.
I think the people who are struggling to become extremely wealthy and
famous are unhappy people, and they're
hoping that the extreme levels of money and fame will bring them relief
from their misery.
As I describe in other documents and audio files, I think we should
design society for the more advanced humans who don't need policemen standing
over them in order to make them behave in a respectable manner, and who
contribute to society because they want to,
not because society is offering them a gigantic cash award. |
Why allow economic monarchies?
When wealthy people pass on money, businesses, or land to their children,
their children become instantly promoted to leadership positions. For example,
if they inherit a business that has employees, the children become the
leaders of those employees. Furthermore, every business has customers and
an influence over society, so when children inherit businesses, they instantly
acquire more influence over society. If they are incompetent, they can
ruin the business, and irritate a lot of their customers.
Americans criticize the monarchies of Europe, but when we allow rich
people to pass on their wealth, we are allowing "economic
monarchies". Americans can sense that political
monarchies are a terrible method of providing leadership to
a society, but most people don't understand that economic monarchies are
just as disgusting.
Our current attitude is that wealthy people have a "right" to pass on
their businesses, land, and money, but we could say that society has a
right to competent leadership. We could say that every child has to earn
his position.
Furthermore, we could say that the super rich
people
are not truly earning their money,
and therefore they have no right to pass that wealth to their children.
We could say that these super rich people are becoming rich simply because
of
the crude, primitive qualities of our society.
For
example, Oprah
Winfrey made $260 million during a one-year period, and Simon Cowell
is being offered
a salary of $144 million a year. However, the people in the media businesses
are not becoming wealthy because they
work harder, longer, or better than the rest of us. Rather, there is an
enormous
market for entertainment products, and the majority of people simply don't
care if they are abused.
Furthermore, some of the extremely rich people have become rich because
they're immoral or dishonest. Certainly you are aware that people in our
financial
and banking system are making phenomenal amounts of money, even when their
businesses are failing. Many of these
people should be classified as criminals.
When super rich people pass on their phenomenal wealth to their children,
they are allowing their children to inherit money that was never
truly earned. How does society benefit from this policy? |
Why allow a spouse to
become a leader of society?
When wealthy people get married, their spouse gets access to the money,
which allows the spouse to become an instant leader of society. This could
be described as a form of inheritance, or another form of monarchy. And
when wealthy people get divorced, that spouse can keep about half of the
wealth, which allows that spouse to retain his or her influential position.
That spouse can then get remarried to somebody else, and if they have children,
then those children can inherit money that was never earned by anybody
in their immediate family. How does society benefit from this type of policy?
Why not tell everybody to earn their position?
And
consider how bizarre it is to allow the wives of presidents to become world
leaders. President Obama's wife is now an influential leader of the world,
but what has she done to earn that position? What would you think if the
wives of IBM executives were allowed to show up at meetings and get involved
with engineering and management decisions? What would you think if the
wife of a dentist, pilot, or car mechanic was allowed to work on your teeth,
fly your airplane, and fix your car simply because she married a man with
that career?
If IBM allowed the wives of the electrical engineers to show up at technical
meetings, it would be immediately obvious
to everybody that those women have no idea how to design electronic circuits.
By comparison, the wives of President Obama and George Bush can easily
mingle among world leaders without anybody noticing that they are incompetent.
The reason is because all of the other world leaders are equally incompetent.
None of the people in leadership positions have anything intelligent to
say. Therefore, it's possible for their spouses, and even their young children,
to mingle with world leaders and discuss their stupid opinions on world
affairs. This situation is ridiculous!
Incidentally, have you noticed how Michelle Obama attracts a lot of
attention when she's around world leaders? I think it is because when somebody
who is even "ordinary" is mixed among world leaders, they will stand out
because they will have a more pleasant personality, be easier to talk to,
and seem more honest.
(I find it amusing that Michelle Obama seems to be a transgender because she
seems more like a "normal" woman than the other female world leaders!)
The world leaders are disgusting people, but we don't normally notice
because they are surrounded by other disgusting people, and because we
see them only in controlled situations in which they recite a speech written
by somebody else, or they pose for photographs. We normally see only the
image
they are creating for us. |
Why allow children
to be treated as financial objects?
When extremely wealthy people get divorced or die, there are often
legal fights over the possession of their children, businesses, land, and
money. In the case of Michael Jackson, the fight over his children could
become incredibly bizarre.
Jackson's
youngest child comes from a surrogate mother who is still unknown to the
public, and now there are reports
that Debbie Rowe, Jackson's ex-wife and the mother of the two oldest children,
is also a surrogate mother. Other reports
are claiming that Jackson is not the
biological
father of any of his three children. And some reports are claiming that
Jackson and Rowe never filed the legal papers for adoption,
and so they never had legal custody of those two children, and therefore,
the biological parents of those children may be able to get involved in
the legal battle for custody. However, other reports insist that Debbie
Rowe is indeed the biological
mother!
If we did not allow inheritances, then Jackson's children would be worth
nothing.
Debbie Rowe is currently preparing
to fight for custody of Jackson's children, but would she fight for custody
if we didn't allow those children to inherit Jackson's wealth? Would there
have been a battle over Anna Nicole Smith's baby if we didn't allow inheritances?
Would five
men have claimed to be the father of that baby?
No society yet shows much of a concern for why people are having children,
or how they treat them. Some parents treat their children as toys to play
with, and some parents have children accidentally and then dump them in
orphanages, and the children of rich people are often treated as if they
are nothing more than financial objects.
In the case of Michael Jackson, many adults and lawyers may treat his
three children as financial opportunities,
and we may see a fight over those children that resembles a group of sharks
attacking a seal. These type of fights could be described as disgusting
or sickening. Who benefits from a legal
system that allows lawyers and parents to treat children in this manner? |
The media businesses
are full of crazy people
These businesses (i.e., television, movies, music, magazines,
etc.) are extremely significant to
society because they are providing us with news reports, historical analyses,
school textbooks, scientific publications, and children's television shows.
They are influencing our attitudes and our view of the world. However,
I think these businesses have been taken over by Jewish
criminals and people with very serious
mental disorders. We are fools to allow such an important group
of businesses to be dominated by lunatics and criminals.
One reason that these businesses are full of crazy people is because
people who are unhappy with life are attracted to the extreme levels of
wealth and fame that is obtainable through these businesses. Unfortunately,
no amount of wealth and fame can fix a person's mental problems or
improve his life. Quite the contrary! Extreme levels of money and fame
cause a person to become an outcast
of society, and it attracts parasitic
people and criminals rather than true
friends. The end result is that the mentally ill people who become rich
and famous end up having a lonely life, and they are constantly surrounded
by people who try to deceive and abuse them.
Some
of the accusations about the people in the media businesses are so wild
that it shows another very serious flaw with our society. For example,
a mysterious woman who calls herself Brice Taylor
wrote a book, "Thanks for the memories". Her brief chapter about
Michael Jackson starts with:
Michael Jackson was just a little boy
of four or five when I accompanied Bob Hope to a place where they were
filming up-and-coming talent for television. Bob told me he supported and
sponsored the Jacksons, getting them a professional foot in the door. Their
father brought the boys in and I remembered seeing them taken into a side
room where bright lights were on. They all had to drop their pants and
before their performance a big man raped each one of them in a lineup.
Her book is available on the Internet and as paper copies. The chapter
on Michael Jackson has been posted
here
at the deceptive website, Rumor Mill News, along with a link to the entire
book. By the way, I mention Rayelan Allan, the woman who runs Rumor Mill
News, in my article about Zionist whores.
If Taylor's accusations are even partially
accurate, then the Americans ought to be ashamed of themselves for allowing
such disgusting people to get control of our media businesses, especially
considering that books have been exposing the disgusting details for years.
However, if she is lying, then the Americans ought to be ashamed for allowing
con artists like her to freely operate.
Unfortunately, just as most people don't care that they have been lied
to about the Holocaust, the 9/11 attack, and the Apollo moon landing, most
people don't care whether the information in Brice Taylor's book is accurate.
A society should have high standards for information
Most people can understand that it's detrimental to society to allow
a restaurant to sell contaminated food, but they don't fully grasp the
concept that it's even more detrimental to allow people to provide us with
false information, especially to children. Most people don't understand
that we are fools to allow criminal Jews to provide children with lies
about the Holocaust, the 9/11 attack, and other crimes. And we are fools
to allow people to promote lies about crop circles, alien abductions, and
supernatural entities.
Most people demand high standards for their food, airplanes, and automobiles,
but they don't demand high standards for information. Most people cannot
cope with modern life. The issues we face are too complex for them.
We allow media businesses to abuse children
As
I mentioned in my audio file for March
26, 2008, we no longer allow factories or coal mines to use children
as employees, but we allow media businesses to abuse children. We assume
that the children are having wonderful lives because of the high levels
of money and fame, but where's the evidence that Michael Jackson, JonBenet
Ramsey, Judy Garland, or Shirley Temple had a better childhood than the
rest of us?
Most of these children seem to have very sad, lonely childhoods. Michael
Jackson is an example. He was forced to spend his childhood practicing
and performing because his father had an insane craving for money and fame.
He was also beaten
by his father because his father believed that physical violence was the
proper technique for training children.
If the accusations by Brice Taylor are correct, or if the suspicions
that Jackson was castrated are correct, then it would be better to describe
Michael Jackson as a victim of serious child abuse
rather than as a celebrity having a wonderful life.
As an adult, Michael was constantly pursued by criminals and parasites.
He couldn't live a normal life. He couldn't walk around in public. He was
constantly dealing with lawsuits. A lot of his life must have been spent
with a lawyer. I'm not surprised that
he felt more comfortable around children and animals. His money and fame
did nothing to make his life better
than your life or my life. Even his two marriages were no better than those
of the poor people.
Some celebrities have lives that seem even worse than that of Michael
Jackson. Some of them have extreme problems with drugs, violence, gambling,
alcohol, and relationships. Some of their lives seem so sad and lonely
that it reminds me of that philosophical question:
If a tree falls down in a forest and
kills a celebrity, would it be a tragic death, or a mercy killing?
|
Michael Jackson’s strange death
An accident?
Since wealthy people are surrounded by parasites and criminals,
it's entirely possible that Michael Jackson had allowed himself to be surrounded
by incompetent and dishonest people who simply reacted to his medical problems
in an inappropriate manner. Furthermore, it's possible that his health
problems were so serious that even competent doctors would have had trouble
keeping him alive.
Or a murder?
Even though only a few days have passed since he died, we can
already see that his death is following the pattern of the 9/11 attack
and the Oklahoma City bombing. For examples:
1) News reports made extreme
mistakes
Witnesses to an event never agree with each other, but there is a point
at which witnesses are disagreeing to such an extreme that their disagreements
become evidence that somebody is lying. Three examples with prior crimes:
1) The Oklahoma City bombing
The initial television reports showed bomb squads removing several
unexploded bombs that were found inside
the building, but later reports insisted that there was only one bomb in
total, and that was the bomb that exploded in the truck that was parked
outside
the building.
2) The attack on the Pentagon on 9/11
On the morning of September 11 attack, some early reports about the
attack on the Pentagon said that there was no sign of an airplane, but
all of the later reports claimed that a passenger airplane, Flight 77,
crashed into the Pentagon, and that all the passengers had been identified
through DNA analysis.
3)
The collapse of building 7 on 9/11
On the evening of the September 11 attack, there was a BBC news report
that Building 7 had collapsed, but the report was broadcast about 20 minutes
before
it actually collapsed. You can watch the BBC video here
at John Dvorak's website.
Incidentally, I mentioned Dvorak in my video about 9/11 as an example
of how journalists cover up crimes. Notice that if you click the link Dvorak
provides for more information (the link under the video that says "BBC
Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell") , it takes
you to the website of Alex Jones. It's
important to notice that all of the so-called "truth seekers" are promoting
one another. This is evidence that they are members of a gigantic,
international crime network.
Also, notice the pattern of how they all try to divert attention away
from Zionism, Israel, and Jews in general. This is a sign that their crime
network is dominated by Jews, not Chinese,
Mexicans, or the Bush family.
By
the way, Dvorak is another Neanderthal.
What a coincidence!
In regards to Michael Jackson's death, the extreme mistakes and contradictions
in the news reports, as I show further down in this article, should be
considered evidence that the journalists were covering up a crime. |
2) We were immediately
told what happened
It
takes months to analyze complex crimes,
but on the day of the September 11
attack, there were people explaining why the World Trade Center towers
crumbled into dust, and why we were attacked, and how the Arabs defeated
our air defense systems. About 3 days later the FBI provided names
of the Arabs who attacked us, and about two weeks later they provided photos
of them!
People are arrogant, especially men, so some of the men who are quick
to explain world events may simply have abnormal cravings to feel important.
However, we should consider the possibility that some of these people are
part of a large team whose goal is to tell us what happened in order to
satisfy
our curiosity, which dampens our desire
to investigate and discuss the issue.
In regards to Michael Jackson's death, as I mention further down, the
initial news reports told us exactly what happened; namely, that he died
from an injection of Demerol. Since nobody had confessed to giving such
an injection, and there hadn't yet been any investigation, this is evidence
that the journalists were involved in covering up a crime. |
3) We were encouraged
to hate
On the day of the September 11 attack, the media began a nonstop campaign
to stimulate anger towards Muslims. The media did not encourage any discussions
about our relationships with Arab nations or Israel, and they did not want
us to discuss the issue of why the Arabs would want to attack us.
Instead, they tried to provoke hatred. They provided horrible stories
about how Muslims hate Americans because we love freedom, and that Muslims
abuse women, and that Muslims are suicidal maniacs.
In regards to Michael Jackson's death, most journalists mixed something
unpleasant about Jackson in their reports about his death, such as mentioning
the accusations of pedophilia, his cosmetic surgery, his "reckless dangling"
of his baby over a balcony in Germany, and the accusations that he was
addicted to a variety of prescription drugs.
Learn
from Anna Nicole Smith
To refresh your memory, she was a stripper who married a very old and
wealthy man who was a customer at the strip club she worked at. When he
died, she inherited his money. She needed a lawyer, and she hired Howard
K. Stern, and he fell in love with her, along with other men.
Her son died mysteriously and Stern denied
any involvement, and then she died mysteriously. Then the
"clown
video" was released to the public. It showed her on drugs and wearing
clown makeup. The video was made by Stern, and you can hear Stern say,
"This footage is worth money." More importantly,
when her right breast pops out of her clothing, Stern tells her to cover
it up, and he says to a man that we don't see in the video: "You can’t
show that, Mark." That remark is evidence that he and Mark were planning
to show the video to the public. This
article claims that the man is Mark Schey,
the president and CEO of 22Digital.
We should consider the possibility that Howard K. Stern was interested
only in her money, and that he was encouraging
drug use, even though he denied
it. And we should consider that he and Mark Schey were conspiring
to set her up to die from drugs, and that they wanted the "clown video"
to prove that she had a drug problem.
The photo shows Stern with Smith and her newborn baby.
Stern and several other men claimed
to be the father. |
|
|
Do you think it's possible that
a man would spend many years trying to convince a woman that he loves her
when in reality all he wants to do is arrange for the murder of her and
her son so that he can get her money? If so, don't you think it's possible
that some of the people who loved and worked with Michael Jackson were
secretly struggling to set him up for death?
Learn from Daryl Smith's attack
on Bollyn
I
think it is very important that you
look at Daryl Smith's treatment of Christopher Bollyn. I have several pages
about Smith here. Smith was trying
to ruin Bollyn's image. After I stopped working with Smith, he did the
same with me. However, I eventually caught Smith in one of his lies. Specifically,
Smith was accusing me of spreading false rumors that Smith was on the verge
of death, and I eventually caught him admitting that during the time I
was working with him, he was "ready for a casket".
Smith's attempt to ruin my image - and especially Bollyn's image - is
identical to what the Jews are doing with Jim Morrison, Michael Jackson,
and other people they don't like. They want to ruin our images so that
you lose interest in us. If the Jews succeed in giving you
an unpleasant image of us, then instead
of listening to us or investigating our mysterious disappearances or deaths,
you will ignore us.
Learn from my
personal experiences
I have been pestered by Jews constantly
since 2002. And they're still pestering
me. They are constantly probing me to figure out what my weakness might
be, and they're always trying to convince me to believe in something stupid,
such as crop circles.
Ever since January 2002, when I got involved with exposing the 9/11
attack, I have had people respect, admire, and love me. However, they don't
really love me. They are Jews and blackmailed puppets. In their "friendly"
conversations they bring up such issues as sex, money, and drugs. They
appear to be ordinary people having ordinary conversations, but what they
are often doing, besides looking for my weakness, is trying to influence
me to do something that would be illegal or embarrassing.
For
example, as I described in my audio file for April
19, 2008, a man in Norway, Trond Halvorsen,
contacted me by e-mail. He seemed like a normal, ordinary person, but eventually
he told me that he was going to take a trip to Thailand to have sex. The
photo is one of the girls in Thailand he had sex with. When I showed no
interest in joining him, he began posting videos on the Internet to "expose"
me as a liar and a Zionist Jew.
Since some Jews are trying to trick me
into doing something illegal or embarrassing, and they seem to have been
encouraging Anna Nicole Smith to do embarrassing things, we ought to consider
that some Jews might have been trying to trick Michael Jackson into doing
illegal or embarrassing things.
They are parasites
and con artists,
not the chosen
people.
I was appalled to discover that most people refuse
to look at the evidence that we were lied to about 9/11, the Apollo moon
landing, and the Holocaust. Several years ago I started wondering if the
Jews were correct that they are a more intelligent race, and that the Goyim
really are just stupid animals.
I still think the majority of people are little more than talking monkeys,
but I've come to the conclusion that the Jews have been successful in dominating
our world because of blackmail, bribery, murder, kidnapping, and intimidation.
Their success is not coming from intelligence
or talent. They are not the chosen
people. They are not a superior race.
They are a crude, disgusting, parasitic group that exploits our weaknesses. |
4) We were told to “get
over it”
Those of us who were investigating 9/11 would occasionally encounter
people on the Internet who would tell us that the attack happened years
ago, and that we should quit dwelling on it and "get over it". I've also
seen people posting messages to quit dwelling on the past in regards to
the assassination of President Kennedy, the attack on the USS Liberty,
and the death of Jim Morrison.
There is nothing wrong with analyzing historical
events. The remark that we should "get over it" is simply a
trick that the Jews are using to dampen investigations into their crimes.
The Jews want us to remember 9/11,
the Holocaust, etc, but they don't want us to investigate
it. When we investigate one of their crimes, the Jews make idiotic remarks
that we are bringing emotional trauma to the victims, or that we are dwelling
on the past.
In regards to Michael Jackson's death, Alex Jones and Jason Bermas reacted
with such hysteria so quickly that I wonder if the Jews were panicking
because something went wrong with the murder. Consider the reaction of
Alex Jones. Jackson was reported dead on the afternoon of June 25, 2009,
a couple hours after Alex Jones finished his daily radio show. The next
morning, June 26, you might expect Jones to mention the death
of Jackson, but instead Jones complained that people wanted to discuss
Michael Jackson's death rather than more important issues! Jackson had
been dead for only about 20 hours,
but already Jones was complaining that people were obsessed with Jackson
and wanted to talk about him too much.
Here are three excerpts of Jones from his radio show on the morning
of June 26, and they are followed by a fourth excerpt of him from when
he appeared later that evening on the radio show of Jason Bermas, at which
time Jones became so upset that he slammed down something, perhaps his
headset, and walked off:
Jones-Jackson-4excerpts-26June2009.mp3
500 kb |
“Jackson died yesterday, you obsessed
fools. Stop talking about his death! It's over with! It's not
news any longer.
“It was yesterday's news!
“If you want to remember the past, remember the Holocaust,
not Jackson's death, you idiots!” |
|
The image comes from a video made by a man named Troy.
Some excerpts are at my Alex Jones page
here |
Jason Bermas also complained about the obsession people had with Michael
Jackson on his evening radio show of June 26:
Bermas-Jackson-excerpt-26June2009.mp3
240 kb
I think it's interesting that Bermas complained about Jackson's cosmetic
surgery:
"Like Alex said, this is a guy that was
so self obsessed with his appearance that he had probably dozens, if not
hundreds,
of surgeries on his face. Talk about somebody who's not happy on the inside."
It's easy to accuse millions of people of getting carried away with cosmetic
surgery, breast implants, teeth whitening, and hair transplants. However,
we could accuse Bermas of being "self obsessed with his appearance"! |
|
|
Bermas recently got braces in order
to close the gap between his front teeth. “Talk
about somebody who's not happy on the inside.” |
|
|
The hysteria and insults from Jones and Bermas
the day after Jackson had died shouldn't be dismissed as insignificant.
How could the two of them become so upset so quickly by the people who
were saddened by Jackson's death?
I think their hysteria is evidence that Jews
murdered Michael Jackson, and that the Jews panicked because
something went wrong, and they were concerned that people were going to
figure out that he was murdered.
Jones apologizes for his insults
Some of the people who heard Alex Jones insult Jackson sent him e-mail
messages to complain about his disgusting behavior. In response, during
his next radio show, which was on Sunday, June 28, Jones made more insulting
remarks about Jackson, and then "apologized":
Jones-Jackson-2excerpts-28Sep2009.mp3
350 kb
The bitter attitude that Jones and Bermas shows towards Jackson could
be partly due to envy. During the past few years I've come to the conclusion
that Jews are more envious than the rest of us.
When I encounter people who have talents or qualities I don't have,
I often wish that I had their talent, but I don't hate them or try to hurt
them. I can accept my limitations, and I can appreciate the talents of
other people. But many Jews, instead of enjoying other people's talents,
become envious, and sometimes they try to hurt or kill them. It reminds
me of an animal that reacts with anger when it encounters a competitor. |
5) Truth seekers appeared
immediately to do damage control
On the day of the September 11 attack, the Jews had people ready to
take the role of "investigator", "whistleblower", and "truth seeker". Alex
Jones, Michael Ruppert, Jeff Rense, and Michael Rivero already had websites
and were ready to become the leaders of what would become known as the
"9/11 truth movement".
If
you are aware of the wolf in sheep's clothing
trick (if not, I wrote this
introduction to it in 2005), it should not surprise you that as soon as
Michael Jackson died, mysterious people were investigating his death and
announcing that he was murdered. And it should not surprise you that these
people were blaming somebody other than Jews.
For example, the day after Michael
Jackson died, the mysterious website, whatdoesitmean, posted this
idiotic propaganda that Michael Jackson was killed by the CIA
using an electromagnetic pulse from an EMR weapon. Two
days after Jackson died, a mysterious person posted this
idiotic message at the IMDB message board to tell us such nonsense as:
• The powers that be, the global elite,
leaders in government, etc., saw that Michael possessed more power than
they could ever hope to have, and felt threatened by it.
• Governments feared Michael Jackson's influence.
That, in reality, is why they have tried for the past 15 years or more
to bring him down
Hopefully those of you who read my website are aware that whenever
the Jews commit a crime, large numbers of Jews are ready to pose as investigators,
truth seekers, and whistleblowers. This is one of their
most important tricks, and you must understand it to avoid becoming
one of the victims, and to help us expose it and
bring
down their network.
Help people understand that the "truth seekers" who are investigating
Jackson's death are exactly like the truth seekers for 9/11, the Holocaust,
and other Jewish crimes. Specifically, they are trying to shift our attention
away from Jews and onto the CIA, corporations, painkillers, or the mysterious
"global elite". |
6) The phony truth seekers
are
international
One
aspect of the Apollo moon landing that I initially thought was bizarre
was that a lot of people in Britain, Finland, and other nations were defending
the official story for the Apollo moon landing. Why would so many people
in foreign nations be interested in
protecting a crime by Americans? Do
you
have any desire to spend your time writing articles and posting messages
to protect the crimes of foreign nations?
July 2009 is the 40th anniversary since Americans supposedly landed
on the moon, and today, July 2, I noticed another
article
in a British newspaper trying to prove to us that Apollo astronauts really
did land on the moon. Year after year, decade after decade, the people
in Britain try to convince us that Apollo astronauts really landed on the
moon. What is their problem? The British are also trying to convince us
that the official story for 9/11 is correct, and that Oswald killed President
Kennedy all by himself.
I was even more baffled by why people in Finland
were defending the Apollo moon landing, and they also created the idiotic
theory about 9/11 that miniature hydrogen
bombs destroyed the towers. And some of the people who defended the official
story for 9/11 were professors in Australia and engineers in New Zealand.
Why would they want to ruin their reputation in order to defend the official
American
story for 9/11?
Furthermore, I was constantly getting e-mail messages from people in
foreign nations, and they were trying to convince me of stupid theories!
The best way to explain why people from around the world are trying
to defend these crimes is that these crimes are not coming from Americans,
or British, or Danish. Rather, these are crimes by Jews,
and these Jews are not Americans, British, or Danish. They are part of
an international network of criminal Jews.
You can see the same pattern with the death of Michael Jackson. People
from around the world are trying to defend the official story, even though
the official story hasn't yet completely stabilized. And you can see people
from around the world are pumping out nonsensical propaganda. For example,
The Hindustan Times, which is a newspaper in India, is reporting:
“Michael Jackson still alive?
Just days after Michael Jackson died, rumours
are flooding the internet that he faked his own death.”
Why would journalists in India promote such nonsense? Here
is another of those Jackson-is-alive reports. The most likely explanation
for these stupid articles is that Jews
are creating the propaganda that Michael Jackson is alive simply to confuse
the issue, and other Jews are spreading
these rumors, and other Jews in the
Indian media, British media, etc., are also assisting in the promotion
of this nonsense. |
Would anybody want
to kill Michael Jackson?
Yes! Possibly millions
of people! For example, even though one of his wives was Jewish, a lot
of Jews were upset with his "anti-Semitic" remarks. Also, he wanted to
end his relationship with Sony and become independent. The people who control
the entertainment business do not want
entertainers to be independent. Rather, they want to use them as a source
of money.
“They suck - they're like leeches. I'm so tired of it.
<...>
It is a conspiracy. The Jews do it on purpose.”
— Michael Jackson |
|
|
“It is sad that Jackson is infected with classically stereotypical
ideas of Jews as all-powerful, money-grabbing and manipulative”
— Abe Foxmam |
|
|
Jackson told this
London audience that he is becoming independent of Sony, and that Tommy
Mattolo, a top executive of Sony Music Entertainment, was a devil,
(a Neanderthal would be more accurate). Jackson
also said that Mariah Carey, who was married to Mattolo, was also disgusted
with him (the photo is from their wedding). |
|
|
So, why do I think Jackson's
death was an inside job?
Consider how strange, contradictory, and inaccurate the news
reports have been. How is it possible for so many news reporters to make
so many mistakes about one man?
There are lots of strange aspects
to the 911 call
The best audio quality of the 911 phone call that I know of
is at TMZ.
A transcript is here.
The initial news reports about Jackson's death did not identify the
person making the 911 call, or the doctor who was in the room with Jackson.
Furthermore, the mystery man who made the 911 call was rather secretive.
If he had said Michael Jackson needed
medical help at his home, then the
ambulance would know exactly
where
they were going and who they needed
to treat. But the mystery man made such remarks as:
“...I need an ambulance as soon as possible...
100 North Carolwood Drive., Los Angeles, California.
90077...
We have a gentleman here that needs help, and
he's not breathing.” |
|
|
Several days later, Dr. Conrad Murray, the doctor who was in
the room with Jackson, explained what happened. He said that he discovered
Jackson lying on his bed, but he didn't call 911 because he didn't know
the exact address of the house. He had been hired only 10 days earlier.
So, instead of calling 911 and asking if they knew Michael Jackson's address,
he began looking in the house for somebody who knew the address. He soon
encountered Jackson's chef, but the chef did not call 911, either. Instead,
the chef contacted Jackson's security department.
The man in Jackson's security department, Tippy, did not call 911, either.
Instead, he and Dr. Murray decided to check on Jackson. He was still unconscious
and lying on the bed, and so the doctor began administering CPR. Tippy
called Jackson's father, who screamed
at him to call 911, which he eventually did. A total of about 50 minutes
had passed between the time Dr. Murray discovered Jackson and the time
Tippy called 911.
Did Dr. Murray have training in
CPR?
When the 911 operator was told that Jackson was on a bed, he
told the caller to put Jackson on the floor and he would help with CPR.
He didn't realize that a doctor was already performing CPR! This brings
up the question of how a doctor who has a Heart
And Vascular Institute didn't know that he should put Jackson
on a hard surface for CPR.
Dr. Murray said that he assumed it was acceptable to leave Jackson
on the bed because it was a firm
bed. Is that a sensible explanation? Or is this doctor incompetent? |
|
|
The behavior of Jackson's employees reminds me of the Three
Stooges. Those initial news reports make it appear as if Jackson died simply
because he was surrounded by incompetent people.
Who gave Jackson the lethal injection
of Demerol?
Many news reports, such as this
and this,
suggested that Jackson died because a doctor gave him an excessively large
injection of Demerol:
It is believed the doctor gave the star
a dose of Demerol — a painkiller similar to morphine — before he suffered
a cardiac arrest.
According to that article, the information came from a "Jacko source":
A Jacko source said: "Shortly after taking
the Demerol he started to experience slow shallow breathing.”
So, who is that mysterious "Jacko source"? To add to the confusion this
news report claimed:
A senior law enforcement official told
ABC News that Jackson was heavily addicted to OxyContin and Demerol, and
received both in daily doses. Officials said Jackson received an injection
of Demerol an hour before a 911 call was placed after he lost consciousness.
So, how did this mysterious, senior law enforcement official know this
injection was given an hour before the call was placed? Who provided the
police with such detailed information?
Other news reports deny evidence
of drugs!
The day after Michael Jackson died, the police officer in charge
of the investigation, Lt. Gregg Strenk, said
that there was no evidence yet of any drug use, and that the accusations
that Jackson was injected with Demerol or other prescription drugs "are
coming from outside this investigation". So, who is this outside
source of information, and where did he acquire the information?
Is Marc Schaffel a valid source
of information?
This
news article claims that Jackson's friend
and former video producer, Marc Schaffel,
released the information that Jackson was addicted to Demerol. Schaffel
has also appeared on television news
reports as an honest source of information about Jackson.
Considering that he was Jackson's friend, it is certainly possible that
he knows some of Jackson's embarrassing secrets, such as his addiction
to painkillers. |
|
|
However, this
report from 2006 doesn't show Schaffel as a "friend" of Jackson. Rather,
it shows him as a producer of gay pornography who deceived Jackson about
who he was, and ended up in legal fights with Jackson. A couple years earlier,
in 2004, the television show Court TV (now called truTV) looked into the
fight between Jackson and Schaffel, and their brief description
of Schaffel was:
...Schaffel, a gay-porn producer whom
dozens of former friends, business associates, and lawsuits have claimed
is a swindler.
If you were a journalist, would you refer to this man as a "friend"
of Jackson? Would you put him on television and promote him as a source
of accurate and honest information about Jackson?
The news reporters certainly know that this man has a very suspicious
background. Their decision to use Schaffel as a primary source of information
should be considered evidence that the media is not
trying to provide us with honest reports about Jackson. Rather, they are
selecting people who will provide us with the information that they want
us to be exposed to. Since Schaffel is telling us that Jackson died from
a drug overdose, this is evidence that the media is involved with the crime
network that murdered Jackson, and they are trying to convince us that
Jackson died from drugs.
When you watch TV, try to imagine that the newscasters, witnesses,
ex-CIA agents, and "experts" are actually prisoners. |
|
|
Dr. Murray denies giving injections
of Demerol
Several days after Jackson's death, Dr. Murray insisted that
he
never
gave Jackson an injection of Demerol, ever.
(new link!) Murray claims that he discovered Michael Jackson lying on the
bed, and nearly dead.
If Murray is telling the truth, and if it's true that Jackson died from
a Demerol injection, that means somebody else gave him the injection. But
if Jackson did not die from Demerol,
then what did he die from?
Was Jackson about to die?
It's interesting to note that reports have been circulating
for years that Michael Jackson is in very bad health. For example, about
six months before Jackson's death, Dr. Tohme was denying accusations by
investigative journalist Ian Halperin
that Jackson needed a lung transplant.
Halperin also said that Jackson could barely speak, and is 95% blind in
his left eye. Halperin also wrote a book
about Jackson that claimed Jackson is suffering from numerous other ailments.
Ian Halperin:
“He needs a lung transplant but may be
too weak to go through with it … [But] it's the [gastrointestinal] bleeding
that is the most problematic part. It could kill him.”
Halperin's website. |
|
|
Some news reports show photos of Jackson in a wheelchair, and in this
amazing report we find:
“Harrowing leaked autopsy details show
the singer was a virtual skeleton — barely eating and with only pills in
his stomach at the time he died.
But other reports claim that the "leaked autopsy" is a "total
fake", and other reports claim it "May
or May Not Be Fake". |
|
|
How can so many different journalists investigate one
man and end up with such wildly different conclusions? The people who purchase
these magazines and newspapers ought to be ashamed of themselves for supporting
journalism that is - at best - incredibly incompetent and sloppy, but most
likely, dishonest and criminal.
If Jackson was about
to die, how could he perform at 50 concerts?
Ian Halperin explained
how a man on the verge of death is capable of doing 50
concerts; Halperin said Jackson thought he was agreeing to only 10
concerts. So, in addition to having serious physical problems, Michael
Jackson's mind was failing also!
If Jackson was about to die, how
did he pass the physical exam?
Jackson's 50 concerts was a very big and very
expensive business venture. At the time Jackson died, the company
arranging the concerts, AEG Live, had already spent more than $30 million,
and they had already sold more than $85 million worth of tickets.
AEG Live wanted a very large insurance policy on Jackson to cover themselves
in case Jackson couldn't complete the concerts. In order to qualify for
such a large insurance policy, Lloyd's of London wanted Jackson to take
a physical exam to prove that he was capable of performing at 50 concerts.
Jackson passed the 5-hour exam in
February 2009. How did he do this if he was on the verge of death? One
possibility is that he was actually in good health a few months earlier,
and another possibility is that the doctors lied in order to allow a nearly
dead man to qualify for the insurance.
The autopsy report will be worthless
The news reports are reassuring us that when the final, detailed
autopsy is completed, we will learn the true cause of Michael Jackson's
death. However, you probably already know that our DNA labs, police departments,
FBI, school teachers, and lots of other people that we trust, have lied
to us so often about the 9/11 attack, the Holocaust, the world wars, the
Apollo moon landing, and every other Jewish crime, that we would be fools
to trust an autopsy report about Michael Jackson when there is evidence
that Jews were involved with his death.
The Jews had no trouble finding coroners and DNA labs to lie about identifying
the passengers of Flights 11 and 93, so they shouldn't have any trouble
finding coroners and laboratories to lie about the death of Michael Jackson.
|
The Jews can easily produce an autopsy report without analyzing Jackson's
body.
All they have to do is have a meeting, agree on the cause of death,
and send the "autopsy results" to their criminal friends in the police
department and media. |
|
|
Why
was Dr. Murray offered a 'once-in-a-lifetime' opportunity?
On June 15, 2009, 10 days before Michael Jackson died, Dr.
Murray wrote this
letter to his patients and friends to announce that he was leaving his
medical practice, but he reassured his patients that "My absence is not
permanent". His first sentence was:
"Because of a once in a lifetime opportunity,
I had to make a most difficult decision to cease practice of medicine indefinitely."
His once-in-a-lifetime opportunity
was to become Jackson's doctor for his world tour. AEG Live hired the doctor
because Michael Jackson insisted on this doctor. But why did Michael Jackson
want this particular doctor? This doctor has been having serious financial
and legal problems for
decades. It
would be difficult to describe him as a "successful" doctor. It would be
more accurate to describe him as a man who was chasing after goals he didn't
have the talent to achieve. As with many people, this doctor couldn't accept
what he was. Instead of switching to a more realistic goal, he continued
to pursue his craving for wealth and fame. The end result was failure after
failure.
Jackson was treated like Fischer
and Bollyn
The treatment that Jackson has received from the media fits
the pattern of what Jews do to people that they are setting up for murder,
kidnapping, or some other type of destruction. I previously mentioned how
Smith tried to ruin Bollyn's image. If you need another example, consider
Bobby Fischer, the chess champion. When the Jews decided to eliminate Fischer,
they started with a media campaign that he was going crazy.
|
This
Time magazine article wonders if chess
made Bobby Fischer go crazy.
The majority of people believe whatever "they"
say. |
"They say that Bobby Fischer went crazy!
Let's hope it's not contagious."
|
There are some people who have developed mental problems as
they aged, but I don't see any evidence that Fischer went crazy. I suspect
that the Jews were lying about his insanity. Unfortunately, most people
believe the propaganda. The Jews stopped giving him publicity, and eventually
most people forgot about him or became disgusted with him. In 2008, he
died mysteriously.
Considering that Bobby Fischer was partly Jewish, you might wonder why
the Jews would want to hurt or kill him. Part of the answer is that only
his father was Jewish, so many Jews didn't consider him Jewish at all.
However, I think the main reason the Jews wanted to kill him is because
he wasn't interested in the Zionist movement. Actually, he was so disgusted
by the criminal Jews that he didn't want anybody to even refer to him as
a Jew.
Was Jackson being set up for a "natural"
death?
The years of accusations
that Michael Jackson was in bad physical and mental health would make sense
if the Jews have been trying for years to set him up for a natural death.
Furthermore, some of the people that Jackson trusted were Jews, and
based upon my own experiences with the people in the "truth movement",
I am certain that the Jews were trying to ruin Jackson's image by encouraging
cosmetic surgery, crazy behavior, and painkillers. And they may have been
arranging for slow acting or mild poisons to be slipped into his food.
Before the Jews could kill Jackson, they had to first convince the public
that Jackson was having health problems, and that his health was deteriorating
every year. Then, when he dies, everybody will assume that it was because
of his deteriorating health. This would explain why Harry
Underwood wrote this
amazing article about Jackson suffering from liver problems, lung
problems, cancer, lupus, anorexia, mental illness, and
an addiction to painkillers!
In addition to all of those ailments, remember that Abe Foxman said
that Jackson was also infected with
a bad case of anti-Semitism.
Actually, now that I think about it, infections of anti-Semitism do
not
hurt our health. Quite the contrary! This type of infection helps maintain
good health by keeping us away from dangerous, Jewish criminals. So I suppose
Jackson didn't have enough of an infection.
Don't be a sucker!
Don't take the anti-Semitism
vaccine!
|
|
Why did news reports claim
that the doctor was missing?
The first news reports of Jackson's death said that Jackson's
doctor was missing, and that the police were looking for him.
Reports also said that the police impounded the doctor's car, which implied
that the doctor was either hiding somewhere in the area, or he had escaped
without his car.
Eventually the news reports corrected this error by pointing out that
the newly hired Dr. Murray was never
missing, and Jackson's other doctor, Dr. Tohme, was never missing, either.
How could news reporters make such stupid mistakes?
Was Dr. Murray supposed to commit
suicide?
The initial reports said that Jackson's doctor accidentally
killed Jackson with an injection of Demerol, and that the doctor was missing
when the police arrived. Those initial reports would have made sense if
the Jews had kidnapped Dr. Murray, and then hours later, after Jackson
was pronounced dead, the Jews kill Murray and make it look like a suicide.
This would have been an excellent trick to fool the public into thinking
that Michael Jackson died accidentally as a result of this newly hired
and incompetent doctor. Almost everybody would believe that the doctor
committed suicide due to the incredible guilt he felt for accidentally
killing Jackson. Furthermore, since many of Jackson's fans were becoming
angry
over the reports that a doctor had given Jackson a fatal dose of Demerol,
many of his fans would be happy to hear that Murray committed suicide.
Not many people would be interested in investigating Jackson's death or
Murray's suicide.
However, the doctor lived, and he is insisting that he never gave Jackson
any injections. The anger towards the doctor is disappearing, and it is
being replaced with confusion over what actually happened and how the news
reporters could make such incredible mistakes. I wonder if the reason Dr.
Murray is still alive is because something went wrong with their operation.
Will Jackson's bodyguard be blamed
for the death?
Since it's now difficult to blame Dr. Murray for Jackson's
death, the Jews may be looking for somebody else to blame. One of the latest
news reports is announcing:
The mystery over Michael Jackson's death
took a dramatic new turn last night after police began tracing the trail
of drugs believed to have killed him.
This report says the police are focusing their attention on a bodyguard
who seems to have been at the center of an illegal operation to supply
Jackson with prescription drugs. So, perhaps the Jews are now trying to
set up the bodyguard to take the blame.
Cherilyn
Lee
In this
AP "exclusive" report, and in this
exclusive video, Cherilyn
Lee, a nurse, claims that she worked for Jackson for a few months,
and that Jackson had asked for Propofol (Diprivan), a very dangerous sedative,
in order to help him sleep. Wow! Exclusive
news reports!
This particular sedative can kill a person in the same manner that Jackson
died. Therefore, we should consider that the Jews are going to use this
nurse as a source of information to explain how Jackson died. Now
all the Jews have to do is "figure out" who gave Jackson an injection of
this dangerous drug, and then they can blame Jackson's death on that person.
Once you realize that the media is under the control of Jewish criminals,
you ought to wonder, “Why would criminal Jews select this particular woman
to provide information about Jackson's personal life?”
Most news reports treat this woman as a reputable nurse, but this
article from the French news agency Agence France-Presse, considers her
to be a bit suspicious:
CNN said it could not independently verify
whether Lee had worked for Jackson. Lee was also unable to explain why
she was contacted by Jackson's staff last week more than three months after
she had ceased to work for him.
You should get into the habit of being suspicious of witnesses, whistleblowers,
ex-CIA agents, and other sources of information that you find on television
or in newspapers because the criminal Jews are routinely selecting criminals
to serve as sources of information so that they can control
the information that we are exposed to.
Matt
Fiddes, one of Jackson's bodyguards
Matt Fiddes, who has this
martial arts school in Britain, was a bodyguard for Jackson when Jackson
was in Britain. He recently appeared in the news to announce that Jackson
had a secret girlfriend during the last months of his life, and that Jackson
had serious problems with prescription drugs. He blames Jackson's death
on the doctors who supplied the prescription drugs.
Fiddes boasts on his website that he has been a close friend of
Uri Geller for over eight years. In this
amazing and "exclusive" news report and video, Fiddes says that both he
and Geller were aware of Jackson's drug problem, and that they both tried
to help Jackson. For example, Fiddes tells us:
• "Uri confiscated injection equipment ...
• “Uri was so concerned that we were going to lose Michael that he
would sleep on the suite floor in my part of the hotel suite if we had
a public event the next day to make sure that he would be coherent and
able to fulfill his commitments”
Wow! Uri Geller certainly had an incredible concern for the safety of Michael
Jackson! Would you sleep on a hotel
floor in order to make sure that a drug addicted Hollywood star can meet
his commitments?
Uri
Geller
If you follow my advice, instead of believing what Matt Fiddes
or Uri Geller says, you will instead ask yourself, "Why
would Jews promote these men as sources of information about Jackson's
personal secrets?"
Geller is a Jew who was on television and in the news quite often many
years ago because he claimed to have psychic abilities and special powers,
such as the ability to bend a spoon with the power of his mind. Everybody
who could think properly considered him to be a con
artist, but the Jewish media would promote him year after year
anyway.
My advice is to assume that the reason Matt Fiddes is a close friend
of Uri Geller, and the reason both of these men get so much publicity by
the Jewish media, is because both of them
are con artists. I also advise people
to be suspicious of everything they say about Michael Jackson.
Sleep with con artists, get bitten
by fleas
Michael Jackson's trust of Matt Fiddes and Uri Geller brings
up two, very important issues:
1) Jackson was a poor judge of character
Since he trusted Uri Geller, who most people would describe
as an obvious con artist, we should
assume that Jackson trusted other con artists, also. We should not
assume that Uri Geller is the only con artist in the world who had an interest
in becoming a friend of Jackson. In other words, Jackson may have been
constantly
surrounded by con artists who were trying to use him for money, or worse.
Which brings me to my second very important point.
2) Jackson's "friends" may have been sabotaging
him
What was Uri Geller's interest in Michael Jackson? Did he simply
want to be seen around Jackson in order to improve his image? Or was he
trying to cheat Jackson out of his money? Or was he helping criminal Jews
encourage drug use, or slip poisons into his food in order to create health
problems, or encourage the use of prescription drugs?
Jackson's death is helping
us!
Decades ago the Jews would benefit by killing those of us who
stood up to them, but today this technique is backfiring because people
around the world can use the Internet to analyze world events. Today when
they kill one of us, they bring attention to their crime network, and they
allow us to learn their techniques. For example, the kidnapping of Christopher
Bollyn helped a lot of people realize that the American
Free Press is a Zionist organization, and that we must be very careful
about who we trust.
The mysterious death of Michael Jackson is already backfiring.
His death is so suspicious that some of the ordinary people, who have been
ridiculing our "conspiracy theories", can see that his death appears to
be a murder. This is causing these people to ask, "Who is responsible for
the murder?"
Some of Jackson's fans are also appalled with the wildly conflicting
news reports about his death, and some of them are also noticing that many
journalists
are focusing on unpleasant aspects of Jackson rather than providing serious
news reports. This is causing some of Jackson's fans to re-examine our
accusations that the media is a network of criminal
Jews who are trying to cover up Jackson's murder.
Everybody
who investigates the 9/11 attack eventually discovers the evidence that
Jews
are the primary group responsible for the attack. If they continue to research
the issue they will eventually discover that Jews have routinely committed
lots of other false flag operations, such as the bombing
of the King David Hotel in 1946.
Likewise, if people look into Michael Jackson's life and mysterious
death long enough, they will discover that the Jews are the only group
of people who were envious of him and who hated him to the extent that
they would want to kill him. And if people continue looking into the issue,
they will discover that Jews have a history of killing and kidnapping people.
The majority of Michael Jackson's fans will ignore the accusations that
Jackson was murdered, just as the majority of people ignore 9/11 and the
HoloHoax. However, some of his fans will switch from being a supporter
of Israel to joining us in trying to stop this disgusting crime network.
Jackson's death will add a few more nails to the coffin of the Jewish crime
network. The Jews are slowly destroying themselves with their attempts
to get control of us.
Don't be concerned that the majority of people don't care about anything.
We don't need the majority on our side. We only need a large enough minority
to destroy their crime network. So take advantage of this new opportunity!
If you encounter somebody who considers Jackson's death to be suspicious,
encourage him to look at my page about Jackson, and encourage him to look
at some of the other "conspiracy theories". Many of Jackson's fans might
now be willing to consider actor Dirk Benedict's remark about the “hundreds
of murders” in Hollywood.
Incidentally, since the video of Benedict has been removed from the
Internet, you won't realize that Jermaine
Jackson, the brother of Michael Jackson,
is the first person you hear in the audio.
Jermaine tells the people in the room that Dirk Benedict probably has
some crazy stories about Hollywood, and then Benedict responds:
Dirk-Benedict-Hollywood-murders.mp3
240 kb |
|
"hundreds of murders"
|
Some of Jackson's fans might even be willing to look at some
of the even "crazier" conspiracy theories, such as: 1) Paul McCartney died
or was killed in 1966 and was replaced
by somebody else, and 2) that Jim Morrison
appears to have been murdered by Jews.
Notice who
is trying to confuse or distract us
Who is trying to stop investigations of the Holocaust? It's
not
the
Germans. It's the Jews. Who is trying
to stop us from investigating the 9/11 attack? It's not the Muslims
or the Arabs. It's the Jews. Who is
trying to stop us from investigating the Apollo moon landing, the missing
POWs in Korea and Vietnam, the world wars, and the attack on the USS Liberty?
Once again, it's the Jews. Who is promoting
the theory that the airplanes that crashed into the World Trade Center
towers were holograms rather than airplanes? The Jews, of course. Who is
promoting crop circles, aliens from outer space, and other stupid theories?
You'll find Jews dominating those issues, also.
Now take a look at who is trying to confuse or distract us in regards
to Michael Jackson. His death is extremely suspicious, but a lot of people
are trying to turn the conversation away from his suspicious death and
onto his health problems, mental disorders, drug addictions, cosmetic surgery,
and especially, the accusations that he's a pedophile.
Those of us who want to discuss his mysterious death are not "obsessed"
with Michael Jackson. Rather, it is the Jews who are obsessed with Jackson.
They have been obsessed with trying to ruin his image for years. And now
they are obsessed with trying to make us forget about his death.
Consider the issue of pedophilia. There are lots of accusations and
lots of evidence that thousands of officials in our government, churches,
day care centers, and orphanages are routinely involved with pedophilia.
Did you know that I recently posted this
article about a European union leader, Daniel Cohn Bendit, who admitted
to what most people would describe as pedophilia? By comparison, the accusations
against Michael Jackson are trivial, and there is no substantial evidence
to support those accusations.
Paul Bonacci stated in court that
Congressman
Barney Frank and other government officials would transport
him and other orphans from the Boystown orphanage in Nebraska to Washington
DC and other states so that the government officials could use them as
sex toys at their parties. |
|
|
There are possibly tens of thousands
of officials around the world who should be classified as mentally ill,
or retarded, or at least disgusting,
but the Jews are trying to divert our attention away from our disgusting
leaders and focus our attention on Michael Jackson. This is a trick
to divert us away from the criminal Jewish network and onto somebody who
is not under their control.
Michael Jackson is now dead, but how many children are safer because
of his death? By comparison, imagine if the tens of thousands of disgusting
people in our media, government, schools, and businesses were to die. Their
deaths could bring a true improvement in this world, assuming they weren't
replaced by people equally as disgusting.
Elected officials should
be considered as
criminals
Anybody that the Jewish media promotes should be considered
as a member of their crime network, or one of their puppets. Keep in mind
that this concept applies regardless of whether the publicity is good or
bad. They give David Duke "bad" publicity, but this is a trick. They won't
give me any bad publicity. They give bad publicity only to people that
they have control over.
It is very important to understand this concept because many of our
police officials, such as sheriffs and district attorneys, have to be elected.
In order to get elected, a candidate must have publicity. If I were to
run for office, do you think the Jews would give me publicity? They give
publicity only to the candidates that they have control over. This is why
our sheriffs and district attorneys are so suspicious. The sheriff in Los
Angeles, for example, seems to have a strange relationship
with the Church of Scientology.
The corruption within the Los Angeles police department would explain
this
crazy article in which the police detectives were searching
for Dr. Murray - who was never missing - and why they were claiming
that Jackson died from a Demerol injection. This is evidence that many
people in the Los Angeles police department are working with the criminal
Jews.
You should get into the habit of asking, "Why
are the Jews giving certain candidates for sheriff a lot of publicity while
ignoring other candidates?" The Jews are getting criminals
elected as police officials!
As I mentioned in my audio file for December
14, 2008, Tom Sneddon, the district
attorney who was elected six times in a row
in my city of Santa Barbara, had an obsession with trying to find evidence
to convict Michael Jackson of pedophilia.
Is there a connection between
Scientology and Zionism?
By the way, the Sheriff of Los Angeles is not the only person
who seems to have a relationship to Scientology. Michael Jackson's ex-wife,
Lisa
Presley, the daughter of Elvis Presley, is also involved with
Scientology. And a television news reporter who spends an enormous amount
of time covering Michael Jackson's death, the disappearance of Natalie
Holloway, the death of Anna Nicole Smith, and the trial of Scott Peterson
is Greta Van Susteren, who is also
involved with Scientology.
In the update
to my audio file for February 11, 2008, I pointed out that when Joran
van der Sloot decided to confess that he sold Natalie Holloway,
he chose to give his confession to Van Susteren.
Considering that he lives in Holland, why would he give his confession
to an American television show rather
than to the police? And why would he
select Van Susteren?
If you were going to confess to
a crime, would you confess to a television show in another nation? Joran
van der Sloot's strange behavior is evidence that his confession was propaganda
for the Americans, and that he was
told to make this confession, and that Van Susteren is working
with the crime network responsible for the sex slave trade.
And we should wonder if Scientology is also somehow involved with the sex
slave trade or Zionism.
How did Michael Jackson select his
wives?
Jackson was married to two women, Elvis Presley's daughter,
and Debbie Rowe. Did he pick these two women because he was truly attracted
to them and felt compatible with them? I'm not so sure.
Elvis Presley's daughter seems to be another example of how the children
of rich and famous people are actually more miserable than the rest of
us. Her money and fame didn't do anything to improve her childhood, and
as an adult, she's involved with Scientology, which seems to be under the
control of Zionist Jews. She seems to be another miserable, lonely celebrity,
which could be one of the reasons that Jackson felt comfortable with her.
Debbie Rowe is Jewish.
Some news reports claim that she is the biological mother of Jackson's
children, while other reports are claiming that she was a surrogate mother,
and that she admitted that she never had sex with Jackson, and that the
sperm that fertilized the eggs were not even from Jackson!
In Michael Jackson's will, he requested that his mother, Katherine Jackson,
have custody of his three children, and he requested that if his mother
died or couldn't take care of the children, that Diana
Ross be given custody. Why didn't he want Debbie Rowe to have
custody? Was he angry with her? Or was it because Debbie Rowe truly was
just a surrogate mother?
It seems to me as if Jackson married these two women for some reason
other than companionship or love. It's not worth discussing the thousands
of possible reasons that Michael Jackson would marry these two women, and
the thousands of possible reasons that other people would be pushing for
these particular marriages, but I can't resist mentioning the possibility
that Jackson was pushed into marriage in order to suppress the accusations
that he was castrated.
Trust the wrong people, and
it could be your last mistake
• The Bollyn family was
kidnapped
because of people they trusted.
• I think Dan Wallace was
killed by people he trusted.
• I think a lot of other people also became victims of people they trusted,
as I described in my 2-part article about Zionist
helpers and whores.
• Michael Jackson trusted people
that most of us would describe as con artists.
If you make a mistake in who to trust, it could be the last
mistake you ever make. But how can you figure out who to trust?
I can't truly answer that question, but I will now give you the guidelines
I follow. To begin with, consider my current view of Zionism.
Zionism is a crime
network
When the Zionist movement became officially established in
1897, it transformed a small network of criminal Jews into a gigantic,
international network. Today there seem to be millions
of Jews helping this network to some extent. Some of these criminal Jews
have only a slight involvement in the network, such as promoting Israel
or walking by my house and sending reports on what I do and who is visiting
me, but others are arranging for murders, kidnappings, false flag operations,
and wars.
The Zionist network and the Protocols
of Zion come from the area of Russia that is the homeland
of the Ashkenazi Jews. The Jews who joined the Zionist movement don't want
to live with their own people. They prefer our societies, but they're not
interested in becoming our friends or contributing to our societies. Rather,
they are like criminals everywhere. They want to take what we have. They
want us to do the work while they benefit from our efforts. They are parasites.
They are criminals. They are disgusting creatures.
Ever since 1896, Zionist Jews have been emigrating from their Ashkenazi
homeland to Europe, America, Japan, and other nations, and they have been
infiltrating our school systems, police departments, militaries, and government
systems in an attempt to get control of our societies.
Their network has grown to an immense size. Virtually everybody that
I've met in the so-called truth movement, antiwar movement, Holocaust revisionist
movement, etc., seems to be a Zionist agent. If you dismiss what I say
as paranoia, anti-Semitism, or mistakes in logic, you could end up just
like Michael Jackson or Christopher Bollyn.
How can you identify criminals?
It's impossible to identify criminals with 100% accuracy, of
course, but I've noticed a pattern among the people in the Zionist crime
network, and once you understand this pattern, you can avoid a lot of Zionist
agents.
First of all, you have to realize that my philosophy towards crime is
extremely
different from that of the majority of people. The attitude towards crime
that is most common in the world today is that crime is due to the devil,
ignorance, poverty, or some environmental cause. And most people believe
that criminals can be cured of their problems by punishing them or providing
them with some type of psychological treatment. However, I think the three
main causes of bad behavior are:
1) Defective brains. The
defects might come from genetic mistakes, or from chemicals that interfere
with the development of the brain, or from accidents which damage the brain,
such as automobile accidents.
2) Defective bodies that interfere with blood
chemistry. Our brain will function properly only when our body
provides it with a proper level of chemicals. Therefore, people who are
suffering from certain types of physical problems, such as a defective
liver or pancreas, may experience strange behavior or mood changes simply
because their body cannot properly control their blood chemistry.
3) People who have a more crude, animal-like
mind. As I've explained in other audio files and documents,
I think humans evolved from monkeys, and as a result, we are a mixture
of human and animal qualities, which in turn means that some people end
up more like an animal than others.
If you follow the common philosophy towards crime, then your explanation
of people who join crime networks is that they are people just like the
rest of us who, by some twist of fate, became a victim of the devil, or
ignorance, or poverty. This philosophy will not help you protect yourself
from criminals because this philosophy claims that criminals are just ordinary
people.
By comparison, if you follow my philosophy, then you can identify a
lot of potential criminals. According to my philosophy, the type of people
who tend to become criminals are the people with defective brains or bodies,
or people who just happen to inherit a more crude mind.
Raise your standards for people
If you follow my philosophy, then you can identify and avoid
a lot of the potential criminals. Simply look at humans as if you were
a quality-control inspector on an assembly line. Ask yourself, is this
a high-quality human? Or does his mind or body appear to be defective?
And does he appear to have modern, human qualities? Or does he appear to
be more like an animal?
Everybody can be described as imperfect and defective, so you can't
look for perfection. But you can watch out for people who are "below average".
Avoid people with problems. Avoid
everybody who shows signs of drug problems, or abnormal cravings for money,
fame, children, gambling, or anything else. Watch out for people with abnormal
levels of jealousy or envy, or people with bizarre sexual tendencies, or
people who are so antisocial that they can only form a relationship with
a dog. Avoid grown men who depend upon women for either financial or emotional
support. Also, watch out for people who inherited their money, or who don't
seem to have any sensible way to explain how they are surviving financially.
Look at what a person is attracted to.
As I described in other documents, life is like a smorgasbord, and each
of us is attracted to certain people, philosophies, lifestyles, and activities.
For example, some people are attracted to the violent, vengeful god of
the Old Testament, and others are attracted to Scientology, and others
have no interest in any organized religion. Some people are attracted to
gambling casinos or strip clubs or alcohol. Some people are attracted to
Michael Jackson or Borat
or Madonna, and others are attracted to football or boxing or other sports,
and others are attracted to money or fame or sex. We don't know enough
about the human mind to explain why we are attracted to certain activities
and philosophies, but if we start thinking about this issue, we might start
noticing patterns. For example, perhaps criminals have a greater interest
in "toilet humor" than the rest of us.
Smith's favorite humor was fart jokes,
which is why he asked me to create this Bovine
Gas Theory for him. It's too bad that I was embarrassed to put in the
level of toilet humor that he wanted. I should have written it exactly
as Smith requested so that the world could see what he wanted. Incidentally,
Smith rarely watched television, but he would end a phone conversation
with me in order to watch boxing. Does
this mean something? |
|
|
Why did I help Smith?
Since I criticize Smith as a criminal, and I warn you to watch out
for criminals, you might wonder, why was I working with him?
We were on different continents, and I wasn't inviting Smith into my
house. I wasn't trusting him with my life. I was simply helping him with
his website in order to expose Zionism. And I would say that it was actually
beneficial. At the time I started helping Smith, in January 2005, I was
losing hope for America. Smith got me doing something to stop Zionism,
such as making audio files and writing more documents. I would say that
I benefited from helping him, and that we did a lot of damage to the Jewish
crime network. I would say it was Smith and the Jews who suffered from
our relationship, and the reason was that I never completely trusted him.
He never outsmarted me, and he never manipulated me, at least not that
I'm aware of.
Look at who
a person promotes or associates with!
Keep in mind that the Zionist movement gave themselves the
image that they are an honest, wonderful group of Jews who are simply trying
to help Jews return to their homeland. A lot of respectable people, both
Jews and non-Jews, were fooled into helping them. Now that the Internet
is allowing us to expose Zionism as a criminal, deceptive organization,
those suckers are going to decrease in number. However, even in 2009 it
is theoretically possible to encounter a respectable person who is still
so naive that he is associating with Zionist criminals. This is one reason
why it's very important to look at who
a person associates with or promotes.
For example, Dennis Peyton,
a professional engineer, appears to be a very pleasant and honest 9/11
truth seeker. In a phone conversation that I had with him a few months
ago, he offered to let me stay at his house, even for extended periods
of time, if I was ever near Fresno, California. He appears to be honest
and respectable, but he arranges 9/11 events, during which he promotes
only
Zionist agents, such as the Architects and Engineers for 9/11
Truth. Is he simply naive? Or is he part of the Zionist network? It
doesn't matter! Anybody who associates with criminals should be avoided.
After somebody explained to Peyton that the Architects and Engineers
for 9/11 Truth are Zionist agents, Peyton continued to promote them. So
I don't think he's naive. The number of naive people is decreasing every
day, so it's best to assume that everybody who promotes Zionism today is
truly a Zionist agent.
Many of the 9/11 truth seekers have offered to let me stay at their
homes. They appear to be my best friend, but Jews actually hate me. So,
why do they want me at their house?
Somebody who was paying close attention to my interview with The Patriot
Dames pointed out that a few days after Edward Abboud visited those women,
he committed suicide!
I've met Carol Brouillet,
and she also appears to be very honest and respectable, but she associates
with Zionists and promotes their propaganda, such as the Deception
Dollar. If you did not look at her friends, you might be fooled into
trusting her.
Apply this concept to websites,
also
To get an idea of the honesty of a website, take a look at
which people and websites they promote. Don't be fooled into trusting a
site simply because they have one or two links to my site or some other
honest site. This is a common trick. Specifically, they promote a few honest
sites in order to appear fair and unbiased. You have to judge them according
to their primary emphasis.
Avoid "low-quality" people; don't
feel sorry for the "Underdog"
Avoid people that you would toss into
the recycling bin if you were a quality control inspector on
the assembly line that was producing humans. Following this philosophy
will not guarantee that you will avoid
criminals because there are a lot of criminals who appear to be respectable
people. However, I've met and talked with a lot of people in the so-called
truth movement, and I would describe the majority of Zionist agents as
the losers or freaks
or "Underdogs" of society. This would
make sense; after all, who else would join a crime network?
Michael
Jackson should have avoided Dr. Murray
If Michael Jackson had followed my philosophy, he might still
be alive today. For example, take a look at the doctor that he was allowing
to live in his house. This doctor has had financial and other problems
for decades. If you were to follow my philosophy, you would come to the
conclusion that there is something wrong with this doctor.
When we fail to achieve our goals, we try to find a way to blame our
failures on somebody else, or on some mysterious force, but our failures
are our own fault.
Michael Jackson's doctor had set a goal for himself to become a wealthy
and famous doctor, and there's nothing wrong with him setting that goal.
However, it should have become clear to him after a few failures that he
didn't
have the talent. He should have
changed
his goal.
In other words, he should have taken a realistic look at his talents
and abilities and accepted what he was.
But he didn't want to look critically at himself and change his goal. He
wanted to become a wealthy and famous doctor. So he continued to pursue
his goal, even though he was failing over and over.
People who cannot accept what they are are dangerous to themselves and
society. For example, since they can't legally acquire the level
of money that they want, they may cheat. Avoid people who are not happy
with what they are. Don't surround yourself with "low-quality" people.
And you should especially not let these people live with you in your house,
as Michael Jackson did with his doctor.
The
Bollyns should have avoided Linda Shelton
If Christopher Bollyn had followed my philosophy, he might
be free today. He trusted people such as Linda Shelton. She was some type
of doctor for children. If I remember correctly, the Bollyns would take
their children to her.
As with the doctor for Michael Jackson, Shelton had serious troubles
for many years, and she has been in jail a few times. She claims to be
a victim of the corrupt Chicago police, and this is possible because the
Chicago police and government truly are corrupt. However, when I took a
brief look at her troubles, my impression was that her problems were her
own
fault. I mentioned this to Christopher Bollyn, and many months
before the Bollyn family disappeared, he gave me her phone number and told
me to call her so that I could see for myself that she truly is a wonderful
person.
So I called her, and during the first few minutes of the conversation
she appeared to be a friendly, adorable woman. But when I brought up such
issues as the Apollo moon landing and the Jewish involvement in the Holocaust,
we started arguing. It quickly became obvious that she was trying to protect
Israel and Zionism. After arguing for a while, I told her that I'm going
to remember her name, and I hung up on her.
If the Bollyns had followed my philosophy, they would have avoided that
woman. Unfortunately, the day before the Bollyns disappeared, Christopher
called me on the telephone. He didn't want to provide any details on what
he was about to do, but he said he needed some money, and it was easy to
guess that he was going to hide from the Chicago police, either by hiding
somewhere in Chicago, or by leaving Chicago, or by leaving America. And
he mentioned that Linda Shelton would be helping with whatever he was doing.
I was shocked to hear that he would trust that woman, and I exclaimed something
like, "Linda Shelton?! She promotes the Holocaust!" But he didn't want
me criticizing his friend.
Jimmy
Walter was too trusting, also
Jimmy Walter inherited millions of dollars from his father,
and is a very generous man who had a tendency to forgive people over and
over and over. This allowed lots of criminal Jews to take advantage of
him. He was constantly pursued by Jews who wanted to "help" him.
When Walter saw my book about 9/11, he wanted to promote it, and he
foolishly allowed lots of Jews to help him. When he decided to arrange
for 9/11 events in Europe, he foolishly allowed the Jews to help him with
that tour. The end result is that Jimmy wasted a lot of his money promoting
Jewish propaganda.
Stan Tipton, who was organizing his 9/11 tour in Europe, was actually
sabotaging the trip (I mentioned Tipton here).
Walter didn't think it was strange that Tipton would fly from his home
in Florida to Las Vegas nearly every weekend. And he didn't think it was
strange that Tipton was friends with Penn and Teller. However, if you follow
my advice, you would wonder why a person would spend such an enormous amount
of time and money traveling back and forth to Las Vegas.
Furthermore, Jimmy Walter was upset with the way Penn and Teller treated
both him and me, but he didn't think it was strange (or didn't notice?)
that Stan Tipton defended Penn and Teller as honest people! Did you know
that Penn and Teller produced a movie The Aristocrats? I have some information
about it here, and you should
take a look. You might also want to see this
photo of them from their television program in which they made fun of me
and Jimmy Walter.
My advice is to be suspicious of anybody who promotes Penn and Teller.
Richard
Dawkins, the so-called "scientist", seems to approve of Penn
and Teller, as I mentioned here.
Walter
didn't like it when I told him that the Jews were lying about the Holocaust
and the Apollo moon landing. I bought him copy of Professor Finkelstein's
book, The Holocaust Industry, and I gave it to him in person so that I
knew for sure that he got the book, but I don't know if he looked at it.
The book doesn't explain much about the Holocaust, but I thought it would
be a good way to introduce him to the concept that Jews were lying about
the Holocaust. However, Jimmy Walter didn't listen to me.
Where is Jimmy Walter today? Early in 2005 he moved from America to
Austria, and one or two years ago he sent an email notice that he was going
into some type of seclusion, and ever since then he has rarely been seen,
but he sends propaganda messages to people on his e-mail list.
I think Walter is a "voluntary" kidnap victim. Walter suffers from Tourette's
syndrome and pain in his leg. He had problems with cocaine when he was
younger, and he still has problems resisting alcohol. I think the Jews
are taking advantage of his problems by keeping him on drugs and alcohol.
I think they are living on his money, and they are using him to send propaganda
e-mail. Perhaps this is what they did with Howard Hughes, also.
Who's
next to die?
Most people do nothing
about crime, thereby allowing it to thrive.
Did David Carradine die a "natural" death?
Did he really tie himself up (as seen in the photo) or pay a prostitute
to tie him up, and then die accidentally while trying to perform some strange
sexual act? Sure, it is possible! Do
you remember that a Canadian math professor
almost died accidentally in February 2008 at an S&M business in New
York City?
People die every day from old age, disease, and accidents, but since
a Jewish crime network is operating in the world, we ought to wonder how
many of the deaths are actually murders. And it makes me wonder, who will
the Jews kill next? Probably not a Jew!
Some people have vanished from the so-called truth movement, such as
Christopher Bollyn, Carol Valentine, and Ahmed Rami, as I mentioned in
other documents, such as this.
Since this crime network is still operating, they will probably kill and
kidnap more people. Who will be their next victim? Probably not a Jew!
Jews are rarely the victim!
The lack of Jewish victims is another sign that this crime
network is dominated by Jews. How many Jews died in 9/11? There was supposedly
one Jew on the airplane that crashed into the World Trade Center, but considering
that those airplanes now appear to be drones, that particular Jew may have
simply pretended to have died so that he could move to Israel and start
a new life.
Recently an 88-year-old white supremacist took a rifle to a Holocaust
Museum because he hates Jews, but he killed
one black man instead of Jews.
And consider the anti-Semitic attacks by Neo-Nazis who spray swastikas
on gravestones or synagogues. The lack of Jewish victims in these anti-Semitic
attacks is evidence that Jews are committing
these attacks and then blaming other people. |
|
|
Don't be afraid of this crime
network!
Even though the Jews are routinely getting away with their
crimes, don't be frightened. Their network is in very serious trouble today.
The Internet has removed the secrecy that has protected them. This is
not the time to be afraid. This is the time to attack.
The killing of Michael Jackson was very sloppy, and the propaganda that
is coming out to shift the blame away from Jews is idiotic. Who is going
to believe the CIA used an electromagnetic pulse weapon to kill Michael
Jackson? And how many people are going to trust Uri Geller? Is this the
best the Jews can do?
And did you see Part
1 or Part 2
of the videos from Benjamin Fulford and Leo Zagami that I posted in the
news section of my website? They're trying to shift the blame to the Rockefellers
and a few other people, but who is dumb enough to fall for their idiotic
propaganda? Is this the best the Jews can do?
The Jews may be preparing
for their arrests!
I wonder if some of the smarter Jews realize that they have
lost the battle, and that Jews are going to get blamed for 9/11, the HoloHoax,
and other crimes. I think the smarter Jews realize that they cannot
get out of this mess simply by killing a few people or making more Holocaust
movies. I think they realize that eventually the police and military are
going to start arresting Jews. I think some of the smarter Jews are preparing
for those arrests by getting rid of the people that they suspect will expose
their secrets.
Consider what would happen if the military were to start arresting some
of the criminal Jews today. The blackmailed
puppets would certainly be overjoyed to expose everything they know about
the crime network. And they would have some very important information,
such as the names of people in the network, and details about some of their
crimes and techniques.
In order for the Jews to minimize damage to themselves, they have to
get rid of the people who might release information about the network,
such as those who are bribed, blackmailed, or obeying the Jews because
of fear. Furthermore, there are probably a lot of Jews who assist with
Zionism but don't have any desire to die for it. Those Jews are likely
to talk, also.
Imagine an extreme situation in which the Jews kill everybody who is
likely to talk about their network. The Jews don't have to kill everybody
today;
they only have kill the people
before
the military or police get them. If they could get rid of everybody
who is likely to talk, then when the military arrests Michael Chertoff,
Larry Silverstein, and others, nobody will say anything. Chertoff and the
others will die for the cause and keep their secrets with them, and this
will allow a lot of Jews to get away.
The people in Hollywood must have a lot of information about the members
of the Jewish crime network, their crimes, and their techniques. There
are probably a lot of people in Hollywood that the high-level Jews want
to get rid of before the arrests start.
Are you a Zionist puppet?
If so, rebel now!
Those of you who are obeying the Jewish crime network because
of blackmail, bribery, or fear should consider rebelling.
If I am correct that the Jewish crime network is going to start killing
people like you, then you ought to
consider doing something before they get you. Don't be a sucker. Don't
die for their
cause.
We are allowing criminal
Jews to get control of our media
People who are ignoring the crimes that occur in the media
are allowing a disgusting network of criminal Jews to get control of our
television, school books, and other sources of information. Have you seen
some of the movies, television shows, and music videos that children are
being exposed to? Here are just a few examples:
|