Eric,

We can talk at the end of this week, as I said.  I need to finish posting my book on my website and have a lot of things to do.  We can arrange the details for the interview after you send the donation to show your good faith.

Christopher

Eric,

In your emails and website you often use the plural pronouns "we" and "us."  For example, in one of the recent emails you sent, you wrote this: "It would be at our expense, not yours."

Who are you referring to when you say "we" and "our."  Who are the people you are working with?  How many people are in the group you refer to?  Who are they?

Best wishes,

CB

It's amusing that you want a small amount of money for "good faith", as if I'm purchasing a product that is in high demand, and I need to put a deposit down!

Since the donation is just a meaningless value to make you feel better, I could send you a dollar when you are finally ready to talk to me. Just let me know when you are done with your work and ready for an interview and I will send a dollar. In the meantime, perhaps this image will make you feel better:

Eric

Remember when you are staying at my house? You would ask Helje and/or me to take a look at what you wrote to help correct your mistakes. I don't have anyone to check for mistakes, and I don't even look over my own e-mail messages very closely. 

Unfortunately, many people assume that I have spent hours composing my e-mail messages and reviewing them, and that I have carefully selected every word.

A lot of people have been analyzing my e-mail messages and articles and then trying to make something of a particular word or phrase. They are looking for hidden meanings.

You shouldn't take any of the words I use too seriously. I write my e-mail messages quickly, and I'm often interrupted with phone calls, and sometimes I do copy and paste without noticing that there are mistakes in what I'm doing.

Eric

You are the one who makes a big deal of the fact that I have not been making radio interviews with you since 2007.  You says things like, "Bollyn talks with K-TKK but he won't talk with us." 

You are also the one who has made many false assumptions about me and then written a great deal based on your false assumptions.  With this offer for an interview, I am offering you the chance to speak directly with me and get your facts and information straight, but you don't seem very interested.  Why would that be?

You have even offered to fly me and my family to California or Japan.  But you are unwilling to post any of my articles since the summer of 2007 and now you are unwilling to make a suitable donation to my research.  How much sense does that make?  Why would you be willing to spend thousands of dollars to fly us someplace but unwilling to make a much smaller donation to my work?  That's why I say this donation is a sign of your good faith and required before we do an interview..

I am very sorry, but there won't be an interview without a donation of $500 or more.

Best wishes,

CB

Eric,

Your response to this question simply does not make any sense.  Are you saying that you don't know whether to use the singular pronouns, I, me, and mine when talking about yourself?  When you write your notes or post your articles, you are speaking to yourself as you write, and many of the times you use plural pronouns such as we, us, and ours when referring to yourself, or are you referring to others?

You used to work with DBS, who was clearly an agent of some dark force.  As a matter of fact you worked closely with him for several years in spite of the fact that I warned you repeatedly about him and gave you solid evidence of his lack of good faith.  You told me that you were working with a person who was nothing more than a "voice on the phone."  I remember how you were not at all interested in dealing with the fact that DBS was evidently NOT on the side of the truth.  So what side are you on, Eric?

Now, although you say that you are no longer working with DBS, you still use the plural pronouns.  So, who are you working with now?  Who is the voice on the phone that now tells you what to do now?  Who has replaced DBS?  You have often said that you write your articles in response to people who call you and communicate with you.  So, who are your handlers?  Who are these people who call you and tell you to forget about 9-11?

It is not credible that a native speaker of English (like you) would use a plural pronoun to refer to himself if there were not some other people included in the mind of the writer to warrant the use of the plural form.  I, for example, would never say "we" when referring to myself.  It doesn't make sense, does it?  Are you referring to those voices on the phone?

By the way, you do know what the term "good faith" means, don't you?  Your comments about sending me $1 indicate that you don't understand what is meant by showing a sign of good faith.  Offering to send me one dollar is a clear sign that you lack good faith and proves that I was right to ask for this donation.  There is no sign of good faith on your part.

In your writings, I notice that you seem to have a chip on your shoulder about not having finished university.  That is really a shame, because you certainly ought to do that for yourself.  You should attend classes at UCSB and get your degree.  You really should.  It would be good for you.

Best wishes,

CB

The reason I'm willing to spend money flying your family to Japan, or some place, is to allow me to meet you in person and verify that your family is alive and free. And the reason I would like to talk you on the telephone is to verify that you are alive and free. I'm not making these offers because I want to entertain myself.

I'm not the only person who wonders about the safety of your family, or about the safety of Carol Valentine, Peter Kwaja, or Ahmed Rami. There are people around the world you have to convince.

You can't even guarantee that the interview will take place. If you cancel this interview simply because you want some money before you even arrange for it, you will reinforce my accusation that you are a kidnap victim, and that this is a trick by your kidnappers to get some money.

By the way, Leon, who mailed a $50 check to you, just called me on the phone and reminded me of an incident a while ago in which a woman tried to get more than $900 from him. You should ask him about that. He suspected a con artist. Telling people to give you money is NOT the way to gain their trust.

It is you that is in the sticky predicament, not me. I don't have to convince anybody of anything. It is you who must convince people that you are safe and free. I think one of the expressions is: "the ball is in your court". It is you who must act, not me. I don't have to do anything. 

If you continue to behave like a kidnap victim, you will continue to support my accusation that you are a kidnap victim. 

So, what will you do? Will you continue reinforcing my accusation that you have been kidnapped? Or will you show me that I am wrong?

Eric

Why are you making an issue out of this? The Christopher Bollyn that I remember never wasted his time on such meaningless issues. Are you really Christopher Bollyn?

Furthermore, if you want to get picky about words, when you say that I was "working" with Daryl Smith, I wasn't really "working" with him. I would describe it as "helping" him with his website and his interviews. By comparison, you were actually working with the American Free Press, so we could say that you were the one working with the dark forces!

Note: I just looked over the preceding paragraph and noticed I used the pronoun "we" in the last sentence!

I managed the website for the "scholars for 9/11 truth" when they first got started in 2005, and they've all turned out to be criminals. So, why don't you make an issue out of that?

I also spend time answering questions from David Ray Griffin, and he has turned out to be a criminal. I helped Sofia, who made the video 911 Mysteries, with various images that she wanted for her website and video. I also help Sofia with some of her audio recordings.

Furthermore, when she was making her video, 911 Mysteries, she wanted to include some burning wood, and a pencil poking through a screen, and so I set up both of those situations here at my home, filled them with my camcorder, and then send her the video, and she put them into 911 Mysteries. I didn't charge her for the work I did. And I did all that other work for everybody for free.

The point I'm trying to make is that you could complain that I spent a lot of my own time and money helping and "working with" a lot of criminals during the past few years, not just Smith.

Regarding the expression "good faith", from what I understand, it is mainly used by salesmen, often con artists.

I think it would make more sense if you behaved like a high quality restaurant. In other words, provide the interview, and then I can send some money after I am satisfied with your high quality service. 

Eric

Eric,

You wrote:   "Will you continue reinforcing my accusation that you have been kidnapped? Or will you show me that I am wrong?"

I don't know if you are being completely honest when you say "my accusation that you have been kidnapped."  This may very well have been something that you and DBS dreamed up together since it began in the summer of 2007 when you were working very closely with him.

This is exactly what I mean about your incredible tenacity to hold on tightly to completely false assumptions in spite of ample evidence proving them to be quite wrong.  Do you really think that my family appeared on national television in Estonia while being held kidnapped?  Do you think that my wife and children worked and attended school in Estonia while being kidnapped? Evidently so.  That means that you are either very stubborn in holding onto false beliefs or you are working to spread disinformation about me.  Since I know you are not that stupid, I believe the latter.

You are the one who came up with this ridiculous story about my family being kidnapped and who stubbornly refuses to admit that you are completely wrong -- and that I have been telling you this via emails and telephone calls since the summer of 2007.  Once again, we see that you are the one unwilling to correct false information which you have created and spread.  You have shown yourself to be utterly lacking in any good faith.  You have libeled and defamed me and lied to your readers for years about me.  You even told me on the phone that it didn't matter if your claim was true or not because it brought attention to your website.  I guess that says it all.

I don't have to prove to anyone that your ridiculous claim is false.  You are the one who is making the false and slanderous claims, not me.  There is already a great deal of evidence in the public domain that your claim is preposterous and false.  The only person who seems unwilling to admit this is you.

By the way Eric, what is your job?  Who pays you to write all this nonsense and how much are you paid?  It seems to me that you spend all of your time in a dark and stuffy room in a little suburban house in Goleta, California.  (We know you spend a lot of time looking at some very strange photos on the Internet.  You even showed us.  I won't go into the nature of these photos in this email.)  How do we know that you are not getting paid by the Murdoch family to do all the dirty work you have been doing on the 9-11 movement?  How do we know that you are not being black-mailed?  How would you like it if people made such allegations about you and then asked you to prove that they were not true?  This is exactly what you have been doing to me and others.

You are the one who will be held to account for the damage you have done to me and others.  People will not forget what you have said about them, Eric.  I certainly won't, nor will my family.  You are making some pretty big enemies -- you should remember that.  You have shown that you are lacking any good faith and are wilfully spreading disinformation about me and my family.  There are not many alternatives to this.  This means that your disinformation and slander campaign aimed against me and my family has been malicious all along.  You are the one who will be held to account Eric, not me.  Life and memories are likely to be much longer than you might think.

CB and family 

Eric,

Right.  I am not really Christopher Bollyn -- somebody has hijacked my email and is writing in my name.  And the person who ran around Paris with you chasing after William Rodriguez loading up at the Burger King was not Bollyn either.  As a matter of fact, we don't even know if Bollyn actually exists, but if he does he is being held by the Mossad on a river boat in Germany.  At least that is what Eric Hufschmid says.

Are you really so goofy in your thinking or is this all an act?  This is where I give you the benefit of the doubt.  I think you really could be that goofy.

I was an independent contractor with AFP, which I think I have told you before.  I was not an employee and was not included in any of their fraudulent employee-owned schemes which began in the summer of 2001, when AFP replaced the Spotlight.  I had been an independent contractor since the fall of 2000.  This meant that I was paid a salary and my only job was to write articles.  I saw it as the only way to get my information about the Estonia sinking and other important matters out to the reading public.  AFP served as a vehicle for my work, articles that never would have been published in any mainstream media outlet.  I don't know if AFP can be called dark forces but they certainly have some pretty dodgy characters working there.  AFP paid me to do 9-11 research, something you are unwilling to do and I don't know of any connections between AFP and Rupert Murdoch...

Your relationship with DBS, however, went much further.  You worked closely with him, producing radio shows and a website long after I showed you how he had worked to defame me with a person in Canada.  DBS defamed me very much in the same way that you have done.  You didn't care about it then and you don't care now.  At least you are consistent in your defamation policy.

You say that David Ray Griffin is a criminal.  If you have evidence to support that claim you should go the local police and turn it in.  What do you mean when you say he is a criminal?  Criminal means a person who engages in criminal activity.  What criminal activity is your neighbor Mr. Griffin engaged in?  What evidence do you have to prove this allegation?

This is the same kind of thing that you have said about many people.  You slander and libel people in your campaign of sowing suspicion of everyone who is investigating 9-11, including me and my family.  Who would be interested in sowing suspicion of people like Dr. Steven E. Jones, the person who identified the evidence of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center?

Eric, I am sorry but I am not a restaurant where you can eat first and pay later.  If you are unwilling to show a sign of good faith (evidence of good intentions and honesty) there will not be any conversation on the phone.  I have work to do.

Best wishes,

CB