|
Jul 3: Andy Hitchcock's response Jul 11: A response to this dispute from one of you |
Thu, Jul 3, 2008: Why don't you send me a brief description, or a lengthy one if you prefer, of your side of the story and I'll put it up so that people can see what you have to say? That will give you an opportunity to explain that Smith is incorrect when he tells people that you're Jewish, and you can explain why it is that you consider him to be a trustworthy friend and researcher. |
Date: 7/3/2008 Hi Eric, Thank you for the opportunity to respond and for letting your visitors know you have done this by putting an update note up on your site. As I mentioned in the previous email, in a conversation with Daryl some months ago, he made the comment, "You're Jewish aren't you." I emailed him about your audio file yesterday and he subsequently phoned me up. He told me that he'd previously come to that conclusion as he'd done some research and the name Hitchcock was Jewish and Alfred Hitchcock was Jewish, I presume he passed that information onto you. I subsequently investigated this online myself and discovered he is never noted as such but always described as a catholic. There's a bit about him here: adherents.com/people/ph/Alfred_Hitchcock.html So from what I've been told, the assumption that I am Jewish has been made upon my surname alone and all I can say to you and your supporters is that is not true. With regard to Daryl, I do regard him as good for this movement as the audio files he puts up seem to be accurate of the times we are in and the historical books he puts up on his site are very useful and can be quite costly to get hold of (as I found when I was buying expensive secondhand copies to research my book), so I believe in putting the Nesta Webster, Archibald Ramsey etc stuff out, he is providing people with the opportunity to educate themselves. Daryl invited me to France and I was happy to go, having spoken to him for many hours with no concerns, albeit largely in an interview setting. I stayed for four days and had quite a pleasant time. I understand that you both have fallen out, and when I emailed you to stop attacking Daryl, I also emailed Daryl to stop attacking you, I just got annoyed that two people who had supported my work from the beginning were continually at each others throats, but in hindsight, it was none of my business and I should not have got involved. I hope this answers your email, but if you or your supporters require anything further, please contact me. Regards, Andy |
A person who has been following this dispute listened to the audio file that Smith and Hitchcock produced for Tuesday 8 July, and he sent me this analysis and partial transcript of their remarks: Friday, Jul 11, 2008: Below is a transcript of a section of part one of the lastest Hitchcock interview with Daryl Smith. You will notice below that they skirt around the fact that Smith claimed it was Hithcock who was Jewish and they try to make it seem like you are throwing out accusations with no basis. Remember how you reproduced the emails where you told him that you heard
he was Jewish because of Daryl Smith?
Well in the email exchange Andrew never denied that Daryl said the thing
about him being Jewish FIRST. So why wouldn't he say on the radio broadcast
that it was DARYL WHO SAID IT FIRST and not you and that you are merely
repeating Daryl's words? Why is he making it out like YOU started this
when it was in fact Daryl?
I remember a long time ago when you worked with Smith and you guys have
David Cole stuff on there. And then it suddenly went missing and was no
longer there. Why? Did Smith take it down because he was afraid of French
hate laws? If so, then why would he be willing to put up David Cole videos
now? Is it beacuse his website used to be hosted in France but it isn't
anymore and so that's the loophole that allows him to put up David Cole
videos now when he couldn't in the past? But how can that be if you were
his webmaster and you are based in America?
In the back of his book, I checked Andrew Carrington's index. He has this: Holocaust, 261
Here's a partial transcript. Please note that I stopped listening to
this nonsense at the sixteen minute mark. Andrew goes on for a bit more
and then actually gets into the timeline stuff.
There are forces out there working overtime to destroy the messenger again. As they have from time to time for both of us. But I have caught more of that than you have.
Your former partner Eric Hufschmid claimed I was Jewish which is incorrect. He never asked me or came to me about it, he just decided to say it. So I politely emailed him back and said he was misinformed.
ha ha Andrew: He goes into the fact that Alfred Hitchcock was probably Jewish. There's pictures of him and he looks Jewish. He goes on and on and it's absolutely pathetic. Ravings of a madman.
Yeah.
Now if they think that, they've clearly not read the book. And he hasn't. He has only read the Rothschild timeline. Now the book has three times more information. I put it into a book because I was getting all this other information and it was just too big to put up on a site. Which is why we have given the ability to get it in bite size chunks which split the book up into ten segments.
This same guy, I have come to understand that his goal has been to destroy cohesion in my support base and others and he was using me as a jumping vehicle to destroy other people's reputations.Andrew: The fact is, these people think that you and I are Jewish. And if they believe it, they'll believe anything. The stuff we put out attacks the criminality of this group. But we also talk about things people have never heard of.
There are some agents out on the blogs and forums and even some of the other websites stating that the facts I put out and can prove and have proven are being ignored and they're bringing up old chesnuts for me to destroy my reputation.
Yeah. Without Freedman's speech, it's things like this that have pushed it more and more forward. These attacks have increased more and more since you split with Eric. 16:00 minutes |