When I first saw news reports of Whitney Houston's death, I recognized her name as a female singer, but I did not know much else about her. Apparently I never listen to her style of music. 

I ignored the reports of her death but, as the days passed, I noticed that there were hundreds of news reports about her, and they were occurring day after day. Why was her death getting so much attention?

I have since listened to a couple of her songs, and I can see that she had phenomenal singing talent, but talented people die every day, so there has to be some other reason that so many journalists are publishing so many articles about her death. After glancing through some of the articles, my conclusion is that "the Jews" murdered her, and they are struggling to do "damage control".

The reports about her death don't make sense to me. For example, she was in her large, luxury hotel room on a pleasant Saturday afternoon with several other people. She ordered lunch and began to eat, but during the meal she decided to stop eating and take a bath. Instead of leaving her food on the table (in the photo), she took a turkey sandwich and some jalapenos into the bathroom. She was planning to eat them in the bathroom after she was finished with her bath.

Does her behavior make sense to you? How often do people stop eating their lunch and rush to the bathroom to take a bath? And of those people, how many also take some food into the bathroom so that they have something to eat in the bathroom after they are finished with their bath?

TMZ is a good source of photos and amusing remarks. For example, they have this photo of her at the swimming pool, and they have such amusing remarks as, "Authorities have told family members Whitney may have suffered a fatal reaction from mixing drugs and alcohol." Yes, indeed, she may have died as a result of mixing drugs and alcohol, but there is no evidence of that, so why are they saying she "may" have died from it?

I suspect that she was murdered by her "friends"

I wonder if she stopped eating because she wasn't feeling very good. Perhaps one of her "friends" put a drug into her food or drink, and when she complained about feeling sick, her friend recommended that she take a bath to relax. Her friend may have also filled the bathtub with warm water to encourage her to get into the bathtub.

However, she may have died before she got into the bathtub. When the Los Angeles coroner was asked if she was naked in the bathtub, he refused to answer the question. It's possible that he was simply irritated with the idiotic questions, but it's also possible that she died before she had been able to remove all of her clothing. Or perhaps she was murdered in the hotel room, and then her friends tossed her into the bathtub because they have some strange fascination with "baptizing" their victims.

Have you noticed how many famous people have died suspiciously from drowning? For example, Brian Jones, of the Rolling Stones, died from drowning in his swimming pool. Jim Morrison was supposedly found dead in a bathtub, but there was no autopsy, and apparently nobody even saw his body, so the bathtub story may have been fabricated simply because they have a fascination with drownings.

Learn from other people's mistakes

I did not write this article in order to justify my speculation that Whitney Houston was murdered, or to speculate on who may have murdered her. Rather, the attempts by journalists to convince us that her death was an accident are so absurd that I thought this incident would be a useful educational tool to help you to notice the tricks that some journalists are using to manipulate us. You might also benefit by being reminded that you must be very careful of who you trust.

I don't understand how an adult can look at these news reports and not wonder if we are being deceived by the journalists and police. I think that the willingness of the public to accept these idiotic explanations should be used as more evidence that most people are mindless sheep who should not be allowed to vote or influence society.

When Michael Jackson died mysteriously, the journalists had some partially sensible explanations, but I don't think any of the explanations for Houston's death are even close to sensible. I'll start with the most extreme example that I'm aware of.

Each of us is our own worst enemy

In a television interview with Diane Sawyer, Whitney Houston was talking about her drug problems, and she told Sawyer that nobody makes her do anything, that she is responsible for her life and problems. She admitted that she is her worst enemy.

I would describe Houston's remarks as a sign that she had the intelligence to understand the concept that she is in control of her life, and that she was willing to be critical of herself and take responsibility for her behavior. Compare Houston's attitude to the people who blame McDonald's restaurants for their obesity, or drug dealers for their drug abuse, or their parents for their alcoholism.

I think everybody ought to be responsible for themselves and be aware that each of us is our own worst enemy. I've written about this concept, and in my 15Jan2008 audio file I pointed out that this concept also applies to all organizations, including nations. Every nation's worst enemy is its own people, not some foreign nation.

	I was amazed to find journalists using Whitney Houston's intelligent remarks as a way to justify her mysterious death! The journalists are trying to fool us into believing that when she said that she is her worst enemy, that she was admitting to being some type of suicidal, self-destructive maniac who either enjoys hurting herself, or who has so little control over herself that she cannot stop herself from self-destruction. How can an adult fall for this idiotic trick?
	A friend of Whitney Houston, Nikki Haskell, said that "someone was supposed to be with Houston at all times, including in the bathroom, to prevent a tragedy like this". However, if Houston needed adult supervision in the bathroom, how did she function in life? Do you realize how mentally incompetent a person has to be in order to need supervision in the bathroom? How can any adult read these reports without wondering if her "friends" are liars?

How obvious does a murder have to be?

The refusal of the ordinary people to think for themselves makes me wonder how bizarre an accidental death has to be before the majority of people - including my own gullible relatives! - suspect that it was actually a murder.

For example, imagine that Whitney Houston was found dead in her kitchen, and that there were dozens of chocolate bars stuffed so tightly in her mouth and throat that she couldn't breathe.

Now imagine the television news reporters playing a portion of a video interview in which Whitney Houston admitted that she has trouble resisting chocolate, and the reporters are implying that her inability to control her cravings for chocolate caused her to accidentally die from stuffing too much chocolate into her mouth at one time. How many of our relatives and neighbors would be gullible enough to believe that Houston suffocated after stuffing dozens of chocolate bars into her mouth?

Can we trust the Mickey Fine pharmacy?

Some news reports tell us that Whitney Houston filled her prescriptions at the same pharmacy that Michael Jackson had used; specifically, the Mickey Fine Pharmacy of Beverly Hills. What would you think if a news report that told us, "Whitney Houston died today, and although police do not know why she died, it is known that she had a home in California, which is the same state that Michael Jackson was living in!"

It is certainly possible that the Mickey Fine pharmacy is under the control of criminals, and that they use the pharmacy to kill people, such as by contaminating their prescriptions with a poison, or by secretly providing pills that have a much higher strength in order to cause overdoses. Criminals could also use a pharmacy to prepare people for a murder. For example, they could put a small amount of a mind altering drug, such as LSD, into a person's medication, thereby causing him to behave a bit differently in the days prior to his murder. Then, after the murder, the journalists could announce that prior to his death, he was behaving erratically, thereby implying that he was losing his mind or suffering from alcoholism or drug addiction.

So, although the Mickey Fine pharmacy may be involved in Whitney Houston's death, the journalists are not considering such a possibility. Rather, they are mentioning the pharmacy in order to create an image in our mind of people abusing prescription drugs.

We cannot trust the authorities!

Some people are getting away with their crimes by being in positions of authority and opposing the crimes that they are involved with. This fools us into thinking that we can trust them. For a recent example, did you hear about the Arizona Sheriff, Paul Babeu, who complains about illegal aliens? He is being accused of having a homosexual lover who is in the country illegally, and that he and his lawyer were threatening that illegal alien with deportation if he did not agree to remain silent about the homosexual relationship. That Sheriff is just one of many people who complain about illegal aliens but who secretly use them as gardeners, maids, or lovers.

We want to believe that the authorities and the people in the medical services are truly concerned about us, but some of them have already been caught committing crimes, such as this paramedic who raped a woman in an ambulance. Some doctors are also involved with rape and pedophilia, and have you seen this article that somebody sent me about the possibility that policemen are taking advantage of unconscious children in hospitals?

It is risky to trust people. Don't be fooled into thinking that the world's problems are due to the devil, a shortage of oil, or ignorance. Every one of our problems is caused by the bad behavior of people.

Who's afraid of an investigation?

With all of the evidence that crime networks are rampant in every nation, and that the Jews have the biggest and most destructive crime network of all, we have to investigate everybody on this planet, including those in pharmacies, ambulances, hospitals, and police departments.

If the Jews did not kill Whitney Houston, then they have no reason to fear an investigation into her death. So why are they trying to convince us that her death was an accident rather than consider the possibility that she was murdered? Why don't the journalists investigate the people in her hotel room? Why don't they investigate the police department or the people involved with the autopsy reports? 

Watch for attempts by journalist to manipulate us

It might help you to be reminded that we are in a battle of intelligence. Get into the habit of being suspicious of all journalists, historians, whistleblowers, investigators, truth tellers, and "experts". Watch out for their attempts to manipulate our opinions, instigate fights, and exploit our weaknesses.

For example, notice the adjectives that the journalists are using to describe Whitney Houston, such as describing her as a "tragic diva", and that she "partied heavily" and "chatted loudly". Those adjectives are not providing us with serious information about her. Rather, the journalists are trying to create an unpleasant image of Whitney Houston.

	The journalists who tell us that Houston "chatted loudly" are providing a good example of the expression "scraping the bottom of the barrel". Some journalists tell us that she wanted to see Jesus, thereby implying that she was a suicidal religious fanatic.
	Journalists sometimes quote mysterious "friends" or "sources" that give her a bad image. They also select photos that make her look bad.

Another example of journalists scraping the bottom of the barrel is this timeline in which she is described as "jumping in and out of the pool and doing somersaults in the pool area". Most people would consider that to be a sign that she was physically active and healthy, but the journalists are trying to convince us that it is evidence that she was drunk, mentally unstable, obnoxious, erratic, psychotic, or on drugs.

Watch out for the Pied Piper trick
 

Journalists often quote some supposedly important person in the hope that we mindlessly follow them.  For example, Celine Dion and Nikki Haskell do not consider Houston's death to be suspicious. We ought to wonder why the journalists are promoting the opinions of these particular people.

Anything Houston did would be used against her

As you look over the news reports about Whitney Houston's death, it should be obvious that no matter what Whitney Houston had done in the days prior to her death, the Jews would have used it against her. For two examples:

1) If instead of "partying heavily" and "chatting loudly", she had been very quiet at the party, and if she didn't have anything to drink, then the Jews could have described her as being withdrawn, quiet, and lifeless. They could have described her as depressed, anti-social, or suicidal, or that she seemed to be suffering from fatigue or illness. They could also have said that she was so afraid of alcohol that she refused to have even a small glass of beer or wine. They could have implied that she was worried that if she had one small drink that she would quickly resume her bad habit of consuming excessive quantities of alcohol and drugs.

2) If instead of jumping in and out of the swimming pool and doing cartwheels, she had just reclined in a lounge chair the entire time, then the Jews could have described her as going to a swimming pool but not having the energy to do anything. They could have described her as behaving like a sickly, 95-year-old woman. The could have implied that she was on the verge of death. If she had fallen asleep at the pool, then they could suggest that she was drunk or on drugs, or living such a wild life that she couldn't stay awake during the daytime.

We do not have any reliable news sources!

Our information about Whitney Houston is coming from a small number of journalists, and they are carefully selecting photos, information, and witnesses to describe what happened. Our only defense is to be suspicious of the journalists and their information.

The value of surveillance cameras

A few weeks ago I posted this file in which I mentioned the value of covering a city with surveillance cameras - including hotel rooms - and saving the video at a storage center for a while. That policy would enable us to look at the video from Whitney Houston's hotel room and figure out exactly what happened to her. If nothing had happened to her that day, then the video would just sit in storage for a while, and eventually be erased, so who would be harmed by such a policy?

Do you sleep with dogs?

Whitney Houston may have been murdered by her "friends". If you make bad decisions about who to trust, you may end up becoming a victim of a con artist, or worse, a murderer. You better take this issue seriously! We are not living in a world of wonderful people created by a loving God. Humans are just intelligent monkeys, and many of them are behaving like savages.

It's important to understand the expression, "Sleep With Dogs, Get Bit By Fleas." Be careful who you associate with. Entertainers and politicians are routinely associating with dangerous criminals, so we shouldn't be surprised when they are beaten, raped, cheated, or murdered by their "friends".

It's easy to murder people with problems

It's easy to disguise a murder as an accident if the victim is known for having problems with drugs, relationships, gambling, or self-esteem. For example, did David Carradine die because he went too far with his risky sex act? Or was he murdered?

Since Whitney Houston had cocaine problems in the past, and she was using prescription drugs in the present, it's possible to fool people into thinking that her strange death was the result of her drug-related problems. People with problems have to be especially careful of who their friends are.

Who is more disgusting? The criminals or the sheeple?

The Jews are not getting away with their crimes because they are too clever for us. Rather, the majority of people in every nation simply refuse to deal with the problems of modern society. Also, there doesn't seem to be any shortage of people who can be bribed with offers of money, fame, or sex.

I often find myself more disgusted with the billions of sheeple - including my own relatives! - than I am with the criminals. The sheeple are inadvertently protecting the criminals, impeding the progress of the human race, and continuously voting for political candidates who are obviously incompetent or corrupt. Without the sheeple as a ball and chain around our legs, we could bring improvements to this world.

Some of the guests of the hotel where Whitney Houston died are demanding a refund on the grounds that they were inconvenienced by security personnel who wanted to verify that they were truly guests of the hotel, and by the law enforcement personnel who made a lot of noise. The majority of people will do nothing to stop crime and corruption, and when they are inconvenienced by it, they expect other people to compensate them for their suffering!

Imagine a more extreme example of this behavior. Imagine that you are a passenger on an airplane, and one of the male passengers gets out of his seat, grabs a young boy, and spends about 15 minutes raping him in the aisle. Imagine nobody does anything to stop this man. After the flight is over, imagine the passengers complaining that they want a refund on the grounds that they were disrupted by the boy's crying, and because the aisle was blocked during the rape, which made it impossible for them to get to the bathroom.

Asking the sheeple to help expose or stop the corruption is like asking a spoiled child to clean his room. They turn away and make excuses, such as that they're too old, there's nothing we can do to stop it, they're too busy, they're too young, they have no influence, or they don't know what to do. They are not sweet, loving, innocent citizens. They are deserters during a time of war. They are irresponsible, selfish animals.

The popularity of an item is often meaningless

At the beginning of this article I mentioned that I had initially ignored Whitney Houston's death, and I suppose some people will interpret this as an insult to Whitney Houston. However, it's not an insult. It's actually a very simple concept, but most people don't seem to understand it, so I will briefly mention it.

Virtually all of the professional singers seem to worry about their popularity, but that is an idiotic concern. The popularity of a singer is not necessarily a reflection of their talent. Some people are more popular as singers simply because they sing the songs that appeal to a large audience.

Our emotions encourage us to follow the crowd. We assume that if something is popular, then it is "better" than something of low popularity. This is a sensible policy for animals to follow, but humans should think more often.

In regards to entertainment, most people assume that the singers, painters, actors, dancers, and musicians who are the most popular are the most talented, and those popular artists are given awards. For example, Taylor Swift is often in the news for winning awards and being praised as a popular country-western singer, but is she popular because she is more "talented" than the other singers? I don't think so. I think her popularity is due to her music crossing the boundary between country-western and other styles. Her particular songs appeal to a larger audience. Other country-western singers are just as talented, but only a small percentage of the world population is interested in that style of music.

This concept also applies to businesses. The entrepreneurs who make lots of money assume that they are more talented than the entrepreneurs who don't make much money, but in some cases they are simply producing a product that has a larger potential market.

This concept also applies to food. Bananas are more popular with humans than onions, but it is not because bananas are "better" than onions, or that bananas deserve an Academy Award. It just so happens that human emotions are more attracted to bananas.

Lady Gaga may be more popular worldwide than Whitney Houston, but that doesn't mean that Gaga is a "better" singer or more "talented". And it doesn't justify giving her an award. Since they produce different types of music, the greater popularity of Gaga may simply be because her style of music has a larger audience.

We cannot seriously measure a person's singing talent, but since we enjoy competitions, it would be more sensible for us to judge singing talent by setting up competitions in which all contestants have to sing the same songs. That would allow us to compare their abilities. If Whitney Houston and Lady Gaga had sung the same songs, we might have found that more people preferred Whitney Houston's version!

Once you become accustomed to being suspicious of journalists, you should notice that they are frequently trying to give the US military a bad image. For example, did you notice that journalists recently showed us a video in which US soldiers were peeing on dead Afghans?

First of all, this video was made many months ago, so who has been hiding it all this time? Who decided to release this video to the media? Why is it being released now? Who encouraged the soldiers to create this video?

Second, notice the adjectives that the journalists are using. For example, Wolf Blitzer describes the video as "disgusting". Why would he be interested in giving worldwide publicity to a "disgusting" video? Why not ignore the video on the grounds that it has no importance to anybody?

Who benefits?

Whenever you analyze world events, remind yourself of the expression, who benefits? Who benefits by giving worldwide publicity to a "disgusting" video? The only people who benefit are those who are trying to create anger towards the US military.

Distinguish between solving problems and instigating fights

Bradley Manning, the homosexual US soldier who gave military documents to Wikileaks, and who has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize, is described by his supporters as a "whistleblower" who is trying to help the world, but he is not providing us with any intelligent analyses of our problems, and he is not offering any solutions.

His supporters claim that he is exposing crimes, but he's not doing anything to expose the Jewish involvement in the 9/11 attack, or the lies that the Jews are promoting about the world wars and the Holocaust. He is releasing only a small amount of information that is intended to hurt the image of the US military. He is a troublemaker who is trying to incite hatred. We could accuse him of committing a "hate crime".

Likewise, the people who give worldwide publicity to "disgusting" videos are also committing "hate crimes" because they are trying to stimulate emotions of anger and hatred. They're not trying to help us understand our problems.

In this article about the "disgusting" video, there is a list of "Previous US Army Scandals". Who benefits by including that list? We benefit from intelligent analyses of our problems, but not by a list that makes the US military appear to be a group of corrupt, violent, sadistic savages. The people who create and promote these articles are doing the equivalent of poking us in the ribs. They should be classified as "criminals".

Don't let criminals set you up!

I think that video of the US soldiers looks staged. It reminds me of the photos of the Abu Ghraib "torture and prisoner abuse". Judging by the attempts during the past 10 years of Jews to get me to do or say something that they could later use against me, I think that the Jews are routinely arranging for embarrassing videos and photos of soldiers, politicians, businessmen, and other people, and they keep them in storage until they find a use for them.

Be suspicious whenever somebody tries to encourage you to do something that you don't truly want to do. And be suspicious when the conversation seems to be drifting to a subject that you would not normally talk about.

Let's hope the US military is wising up!

The photo below is confusing. Since most Americans have been convinced that the Nazis are the most evil creatures to ever exist on the planet Earth, it is not likely that the Marines accidentally created a logo for themselves that is virtually identical to the Nazi SS logo. So, how do we explain this photo?

It's possible that the Jews tricked the Marines into posing for this photo in order to give the US military a bad image, but let's hope that the Marines created that photo in order to send a message to Wolf Blitzer and other Jews that they are becoming aware of the truth, and fed up with their disgusting behavior.

Once you become suspicious of journalists, you might notice that certain journalists, mainly Jews, frequently give publicity to idiotic cartoons, images, and remarks that they claim are insulting to some group of people. For example, the Jews occasionally give publicity to a Mohammed cartoon in an attempt to incite anger with Muslims. The Jews arrange for these cartoons to be created, and then they give them worldwide publicity.

	Recently I noticed that journalists are providing reports that "racist" Americans are insulting the Chinese basketball player, Jeremy Lin.  For example, on one website, the headline "Chink In The Armor" was displayed.  Journalists could have ignored that remark, or they could have described it as humourous, or as silly, or as idiotic, but instead they described it as "racist".
	The graphic of Jeremy Lynn's face with a fortune cookie could also been described as humorous, or as silly, but instead, the journalists described this image with such adjectives as regrettable, controversial, and offensive. The journalists are trying to incite anger among the Chinese people, but rather than be offended by these images, the Chinese people should become disgusted that the journalists are trying to start fights.

You ought to spend some time considering how much more peaceful the world would be if the journalists were not constantly reminding the Chinese people that they are victims of racist Americans; reminding women that they are victims of sexist men; and reminding Americans that they are victims of fanatical, suicidal Muslim terrorists who hate us and want to attack us with nuclear bombs. These journalists should be described as "con artists", "criminals", and "destructive influences on society".

In January 2012, John Kerry had a broken nose and bruises on his face. He proudly boasted to the other government officials that it was from playing ice hockey.

Kerry's injuries remind me of the day that President Bush was watching a football game on television and bruised his face while eating pretzels. Do you believe either of their explanations?

Since politicians are sleeping with dogs, it's not surprising that they seem miserable, and that they are occasionally beaten, and sometimes killed.

I would not describe America as having a "government". I would say that we have a group of criminals and their puppets. The voters ought to be embarrassed and ashamed of what they have created, but they refuse to take responsibility for their government.

After what I wrote about Peggy (here is the first page), I assumed that she would never contact me again. However, she has been calling me almost every month since then!

Peggy repeats the same message over and over; specifically, she tells me that she wants to leave America, and that she loves me. She uses the "Damsel In Distress" trick over and over. How many more years is she going to call me? How can her behavior even be described as "human"?

By the way, the last time she called me was on Saturday, 11 February 2012.  I don't remember the time of day, but it was the same day that Whitney Houston died. What a coincidence! Or was she calling me to find out if I would say something about Whitney Houston?

Also, what a coincidence that Whitney Houston died on the 11th day of the month. Have you noticed that these criminals have a fascination with numbers, especially the number 11? I listed a few of the many coincidences on this page. Also, the hotel room that Whitney Houston died in was room 434. Guess what those digits add up to? What a coincidence!

Lady Gaga's latest music video, Marry The Night, reminds me of the "California Gurl" video by Katy Perry in that both videos seem to have hidden meanings about how they became famous. Gaga's video starts with her being prepared for surgery, and she cries a bit as she complains that she has nothing to lose.

Update: there is now so much evidence that the people who have become extremely wealthy and famous have agreed to "sell their soul to the devil," that is, join a crime network, that I now think that Marry the Night is about her decision to join the crime network.\

Since it is a decision that she cannot get out of, she will never be able to return to her previous life as a normal person. After her mysterious surgery, she is wheeled into a room where other people are standing on a balcony and watching her. Those people may be the other famous entertainers who already went through the process of joining the crime network.

The ceiling of the building is decorated with art, and it has the words "The Cross Is My Anchor" written on it, but in a mirrored form. (You can read the words in the image below because I reversed the image.)

Compare Lady Gaga to Whitney Houston

Although Lady Gaga is often criticized and insulted, she gets a lot of favorable publicity, and she has been able to work with some government officials in an attempt to push the military into accepting homosexuals, and to change society's attitudes towards "bullying".

What if Whitney Houston had dressed and behaved more like Lady Gaga? And what if Whitney Houston was assisting the campaign to push the US military into accepting homosexuals? If she had behaved more like Lady Gaga, would she have been treated better by the journalists? I don't think so. I think that if she had behaved more like Lady Gaga, she would have received even more insults.

I think the Jews are promoting certain people, such as Lady Gaga, and suppressing certain other people that they cannot compete with, or who they are envious of, such as Whitney Houston.

Based on the way suspicious people - mostly Jews - have been pursuing me for the past 10 years, and how they have been trying to manipulate me, I wouldn't be surprised if the Jews were secretly encouraging Whitney Houston to associate with people who would be a bad influence on her, such as drug users. I also wouldn't be surprised if they were encouraging her to sing songs that have low popularity.

How would you treat Whitney Houston?

Imagine if you were the owner of a music business, and Whitney Houston was one of your clients. How would you treat her? Would you encourage her to associate with cocaine users or psychopaths? Would you encourage her to go to bars and get drunk? Or would you encourage her to take care of herself, develop her talent, and associate with people who will be a good influence in her life?

The Jews do not work with us, and they do not want to help us develop our talents. The Jews cannot compete with us in a fair manner. They have dreary personalities, and they are so ugly that they don't even like the way they look. Jews frequently have cosmetic surgery to look more like us, but we never ask a cosmetic surgeon to make us look more like a Jew.

Some Jews have asked Barbra Streisand why she never had cosmetic surgery to give her nose a more human appearance, but I doubt if anybody asked Whitney Houston why she didn't give herself a Jewish nose. Incidentally, I wonder if the story of Pinocchio came about as people noticed that the most prolific liars have big noses.

The Jews are dominating society, but their success doesn't come from talent. Rather, it comes from murder, blackmail, manipulation, deception, bribery, intimidation, and sabotage. They also depend upon pity, inheritances, handouts, nepotism, and monarchies.

Getting publicity is not an honor!

We assume that we are "special" if we win a Nobel Prize, an Academy award, or are interviewed on television, but it seems that everybody who gets publicity is either a member of the Jewish crime network, or one of their "useful idiots". 

Take a look at the black people who are given publicity on American television. Are they your idea of "respectable" black people? I would describe them as having dreary, dull, angry, or unpleasant personalities. They are constantly whining about racism, sexism, or "The Man", and many of them whine for handouts or reparations. Some of them are obnoxious, violent, or stupid. I think they have been chosen by the Jews to give black people a bad image, and to encourage bad attitudes among black people. I think people like Whitney Houston are being suppressed.

We should be suspicious of everybody who gets publicity, and if any of you gets publicity, you should ask yourself, "Am I really special? Or am I a sucker who is being taken advantage of?"

We need to raise standards for influential people

Lady Gaga spends some of her time on a campaign to stop bullying and promote homosexuals. She claims to have been bullied when she was in school. I don't know what she is like in real life, but from the few video interviews I've seen of her, I would describe her as dreary, drab, dull, and extremely self-centered. I can understand why she was bullied. She's not what I would describe as happy, cheerful, or sociable. She does not have the type of personality that I am attracted to.

I think Lady Gaga is yet another example of an artist who is unhappy, and who is chasing after money and fame in a futile hope to end their misery. I also think she is another example of why we must raise standards for people in influential positions. She and other people who are pushing their opinions on us are not helping any of us. They are troublemakers who encourage pouting, anger, whining, and fights. They are not providing us with intelligent analyses of the world's problems, and they are not offering any solutions.

They don't work with us, either. Instead, they try to suppress their competitors. They want to be Kings and Queens that we pamper and worship.

I get most of my news from the Google news page, and I frequently find articles that encourage us to feel sorry for, or admire, Jennifer Aniston, and there are lots of other articles that criticize Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt. It seems as if a lot of journalists are furious that Brad Pitt divorced Aniston, but why would any journalist care who Brad Pitt is married to?

Some journalists accuse Jolie of "stealing" Pitt, and although it's true that women are capable of deceiving men, nobody is showing evidence that Jolie has fooled Brad Pitt. Furthermore, if Aniston was such a desirable woman, then there would be lots of other men who would be happy to replace Brad Pitt as her husband, but where are all those men?

Do you care who Pitt marries? I don't care who he selects to be his friend or spouse, although I like to think that he and other people are having pleasant relationships. I don't want to see people suffering. Why don't the journalists also want to see Brad Pitt in a happy relationship? Why don't they tell Jennifer Aniston to find a man she is more compatible with? Why are they conducting a "hate campaign" against both Pitt and Angelina Jolie?

The headline of this article, for example, is what I might expect from a bratty junior high school girl: Jennifer Aniston Outshines Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, and it has such remarks as, "but there's one thing Jennifer Aniston now has that they don't -- a Hollywood star."

The constant and childish attacks of Pitt and Jolie and the endless attempts to bring pity to Aniston are as suspicious as the idiotic articles about Whitney Houston's death. People are getting divorced every day all around the world, so why don't they attack any of the other divorced couples? Why are they concentrating on Brad Pitt? Who benefits from this?

Years ago I ignored these type of reports on the grounds that they were meaningless Hollywood gossip, but with Peggy pursuing me year after year like a psychotic savage, and with the realization that our media is full of criminal Jews, I wonder if we are watching one of the disgusting reactions that Jews have to competitors. Specifically, we may be watching a coordinated attempt to intimidate, control, and/or destroy Jolie and Pitt, and to bring pity to Aniston, perhaps because she's partly Jewish.

I suspect that the anger towards Pitt and Jolie is actually an intense envy. The Jews are probably emotionally distraught that the public continues to be attracted to Pitt and Jolie despite all of the insulting articles the Jews have written about them.
Update: 15 March 2012: More attacks on Angelina Jolie

Why should you care about Jennifer Aniston?

You may assume that the people in Hollywood have no significance to your life, but the people in the media are providing us with most of our information about the world, and they also write and publish school books, history books, and scientific magazines. They also have a tremendous influence over children. We are fools to allow criminals to get control of our media. We should provide ourselves with a media of respectable, intelligent journalists that we can trust. 

It's best to think of a nation as a very large family. If you were the father of a large family, would you allow some of your children to produce a newsletter and use it to conduct obnoxious and idiotic attacks on some of your other children? We should not allow crime networks to use the media to eliminate their competitors and manipulate us!

We are allowing our society to become a collection of people who don't get along with one another, don't speak the same language, and routinely fight and cheat one another. This is idiotic! A society should be a group of people who enjoy one another, cooperate with one another, and work together for the benefit of all.
 

A lot of what appears to be meaningless Hollywood events might actually be very significant. For example, why is the Kardashian family in the news so often? It seems that Ryan Seacrest is promoting the family, but why that particular family?

Your first thought might be that Seacrest simply sees a profit potential in the Kardashian family, but Seacrest is a highly paid, influential man in the media, so we ought to consider the possibility that the Jewish crime network is considering him as a replacement for one of the aging criminals who currently dominate the media. If Seacrest is a "rising star" in their crime network, then his actions are not simply for profit. Rather, they are to help the crime network. Therefore, we should consider that his promotion of the Kardashian family has some benefit to the crime network.

Did you know that the father of the Kardashian family, Robert, was a very close friend of O.J. Simpson? He became Simpson's lawyer when Simpson was accused of murdering his ex-wife, Nicole. As I've mentioned in other files, I don't think Simpson murdered Nicole, but I suspect that the reason his trial was so bizarre is because both Simpson and the prosecutor were afraid to be completely honest because total honesty would have exposed the Jewish crime network and the illegal activities that Simpson was involved with.

I suppose Robert Kardashian knew the truth about Nicole's murder, and he probably also knew a lot about the Jewish crime network. Therefore, I wonder if his death by cancer at age 59 was "natural", or if the Jews gave him something to cause cancer, and I also wonder if Seacrest is promoting the Kardashian family in order to keep them under control, happy, and quiet.

Or maybe Robert Kardashian was working with the crime network in order to control people such as O.J. Simpson, and perhaps the entire Kardashian family is just a group of criminals!

For another example of how an apparently meaningless event may have significance is that there are reports that Simon Cowell might consider Janet Jackson to be a judge in the X Factor television show. Is he considering her purely from the point of view of whether she will bring profit to the television show? Or is this a bribe to keep the Jackson family happy and silent about the mysterious deaths of Michael Jackson and Whitney Houston?

I can't prove that Whitney Houston was murdered, and I can't explain why the Kardashian family is in the news so often, but we don't need the details of world events to realize that we are being taken advantage of by criminals, and we don't need the details to improve the world. All we have to do is identify and remove the people who are causing trouble. But who among us is causing trouble?

The only way we can figure that out is to be suspicious of and observe our co-workers, neighbors, and relatives. Are any of your neighbors a bad influence on society? What about the people you work with? Each of us has thousands of relatives; how many of them are causing trouble?

Our distant ancestors intimately knew the people they were living with, and we need to stop the secrecy and learn about the people we are living with. Then we need to pass judgment on which of those people we don't want living with us!