Charlie Sheen;
Could they have chosen a more
bizarre and disturbing character to expose 9/11?
updated 6 May 2006
Did you trust CNN, Alex Jones,
and the others to expose 9/11?
Charlie Sheen (real name: Carlos Irwin Estévez) has
had a reputation for frequenting prostitutes, having porn stars as love
interests, and not keeping his nose out of drugs.
He married Denise Richards
in 2002.
|
|
Here are some amusing remarks about him from April 2005:
hollywood.com/news/detail/id/2438859
How about his treating a baseball team to sex:
contactmusic.com:
Sheen treats baseball team to hookers and porn stars
In 1997 his girlfriend, Brittany Ashland, another
of his porn star girlfriends, filed charges against him in 1997
for grabbing her by the hair and throwing her to the floor, which knocked
her unconscious and split her lip open:
cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-6033888-504083.html
Accusations from Denise Richards
Charlie Sheen knew his divorce from Denise Richards would be making
the news during 2006, and he knew that she had a lot of embarrassing information.
Here is a PDF file of her request for a restraining order against Sheen:
tmz.aol.com
exclusive richards shocking allegations
Some embarrassing accusations in that document:
• On their honeymoon, she discovered he was using Xanax.
He told her to keep quiet about it because recovering alcoholics are not
supposed to use the drug.
• Six month later she discovers he had a serious and expensive gambling
problem; that he was gambling every day.
• He had wild mood swings.
• He continued to abuse prescription pain medications
long after the Honeymoon.
• He was looking at gay pornography
on the Internet, and the boys appeared to be below
the legal age.
• He belonged to several Internet sites where people arrange
sexual encounters, and the photograph that he used for his profile
was "his erect penis". He emailed
this photo to approximately 30 women.
• On April 12 she spoke to him on the telephone and he told her that
she will never be able to tell the truth about him in a court case over
the children because she will be dead before she
gets to court.
During
that conversation she brought up the death of Chloe Jones, a prostitute/porn
star who claimed to have sex with Sheen for a total of $15,000.
Denise Richards asked Sheen if he had anything to do with her death (she
died in 2005 at age 29). Sheen responded "no comment".
When asked a second time, he again replied "no comment". Was Sheen merely
trying to torment his ex-wife?
Chloe Jones' best friend said that Jones wanted to get out of the sex
industry, and that she was thinking of writing a book. But a book about
what? She had already sold her story of sex with Sheen, so if she was planning
to write about her experiences in the sex industry, wouldn't some criminals
and famous people like to see her die an untimely death?
ChloeJonesPassesAway.html
Chloe's mother has been in contact with a lawyer about filing a wrongful
death suit against Sheen because she says Chloe was "terrified to death"
of Sheen:
hollywood.com/news/detail/id/3499111
Like so many of Sheen's girlfriends and other porn stars, Chloe Jones
had a miserable life, despite all her money and fame. For example, she
was hit on the head with a baseball bat and then raped:
washingtontimes.com/upi/20050621-093800-8977r.htm
• One of Denise Richards' complaints is actually amusing: she complains
that Sheen was obsessed that 9/11 was a conspiracy.
That particular complaint probably applies to most of the people reading
this article! Let this be a warning to you; your interest in 9/11 could
be used to justify a restraining order against
you.
Why did Charlie Sheen come forward
to expose 9-11?
Sheen certainly knew that Denise's accusations would be coming out in
2006. So did their lawyers, other people within the legal system, and the
psychologist they went to see, Dr. Stan Katz.
Apparently he is the same Stan Katz who was one of the
key players in the Michael Jackson child molestation trial:
chaos2004.com/key.php |
|
The point is that many people knew that Charlie Sheen would soon
be exposed as an emotionally unstable man, and that his cravings
for gambling, drugs, prostitutes, (child?) pornography, and prescription
painkillers are more extreme than previously reported.
All publicity for 9/11 is good, so even a person with Charlie Sheen's
bad reputation can help expose the 9/11 crime. However, if CNN truly wanted
to expose 9/11, they would have selected somebody we could respect.
CNN ignored all 9/11 investigators before
they promoted Sheen, and they are still ignoring
all other 9/11 investigators. The inescapable conclusion is that they are
not
trying to expose 9/11; rather, they are only interested in promoting
Sheen
as a 9/11 hero.
Why did CNN, Alex Jones, Jeff
Rense, and others promote Charlie Sheen to such an extreme?
Jeff Rense (rense.com) had a dozen articles at the top of his site in
prime location in order to promote Sheen as a 9-11 "truth" spokesman, and
Alex Jones also wrote glowing articles about Sheen, as well as praise him
repeatedly on his radio show.
Why would CNN and these "truth seekers" hold up such an embarrassing
man when there are so many more respectable people to select from?
One possibility is that the criminal network responsible for 9-11 told
Sheen to come forward, and they told Sheen to contact Alex Jones. This
would have several benefits for the criminals.
• It would pacify the people who want 9/11 exposed. They would
feel that their savior has finally arrived and will deliver them from the
Bush administration.
It would also boost the image of Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, Scholars For
9/11 Truth, 911blogger, and all of the other 9/11 groups that praised Sheen
as a courageous hero.
And it would fool people into thinking that CNN is an honest news agency
that is struggling to expose this terrible crime.
• The people who are resisting 9-11, and most of the people who do not
yet know about 9/11, are not likely to be influenced by an actor with such
a terrible reputation. Instead, they are more likely to ridicule the conspiracy
theorists who look to mentally unstable Hollywood actors for guidance.
So Sheen may have given 9-11 theories a bad image to those particular
people.
Why wasn't I fooled by CNN?
As soon as Sheen appeared on the CNN television show, I posted an article
to warn you that this is undoubtedly some sort of deception:
Charlie-Sheen-deception.html
How would I know? Actually, I cannot be sure of anything, but here is
my reasoning:
• Hollywood and the media
is controlled by Zionists, so whenever they "expose" 9/11, Zionism, Israeli
crimes, or terrorism, we have to wonder how their exposé is twisted
to benefit Zionism.
The television networks and all the newspapers and magazines will not
expose 9/11 because they are deeply involved with
these crimes:
MediaIsTheEnemy.htm
Therefore, when they expose 9/11, they are doing so for a diabolical
reason, such as to give a bad image to alternative theories on 9/11, or
to help their friends (eg, Alex Jones, Jeff Rense) get control of the 911
truth movement, or to shift the blame away from Zionists and over to Bush
and Cheney.
• Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, Wayne
Madsen, Webster Tarpley, Scholars For 9/11 Truth, Kurt Nimmo, 911blogger.com,
911truth.org, and almost all the other "truth seekers" are minimizing,
defending, twisting, or ignoring the issues of Zionism. They are not really
interested in exposing 9/11, Zionism, the media, Israel, or the banking
system.
Their goal is to frighten us into
thinking we are helpless to protect ourselves from the mysterious New
World Order. Therefore, whenever these "truth seekers" promote
a person, book, theory, or web site, we have to wonder how it benefits
the Zionist movement.
Please look into the issue of
Zionism
• |
Ben Freedman's speech has helped
thousands of other people understand the complaints about Zionism. Please
notice that Kurt Nimmo, Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, Charlie Sheen, the
Scholars for 9/11 Truth, and all of the other truth seekers ignore
or minimize the importance of this speech, as well as the issue of "Judea
Declares War On Germany":
Ben_Freedman.html |
|