|
1) |
Craven assumes there is a point
of no return
Craven assumes that if we wait to find out if the global warming theories
are accurate, it will be too late and
we will suffer tremendously. He assumes that the climate is like a sheet
of glass that can suddenly break, and once broken, it can never be fixed.
However, there is no scientific support
for this assumption. It makes more sense to assume that if we can increase
the temperature by producing carbon dioxide, then we can decrease the temperature
by reducing our production of carbon dioxide.
Craven's attitude could be described as a threat,
or an ultimatum. |
|
 |
|
2) |
Craven advocates that we assume the frightening
scenarios are correct
There are a lot of assumptions about the weather. For example, some
scientists believe that variations in the sun's energy is the main
reason that Earth's temperature fluctuates. However, Craven ignores the
non-doomsday scenarios and advocates that we assume only
the most frightening scenarios are correct.
His reasoning is that if the frightening
scenarios are correct, then we will destroy the Earth if we don't do something
to prevent them from coming true. |
|
 |
|
|
| The absurdity of this type of reasoning might become more apparent
when you realize that it could be applied to lots of idiotic issues. For
example, Jeff Rense, Stanton Friedman, and Steven Greer tell us that aliens
from other planets are here on the earth, and they might
want to kill us.
Thererefore, we could create a video that is identical
to Craven's video about global warming, except that it would advocate we
prevent a global alien invasion.
We would use the exact same reasoning
that Craven that uses; namely, that we don't know if the scenarios of aliens
invasions are correct, but if we don't prepare for an alien invasion, we
will suffer tremendously if the aliens attack us. |
|
 |
| |
3) |
Craven assumes that global warming will be
awful
He assumes that a warmer climate will make our lives miserable and
ruin the earth, but there is no evidence that we should be afraid of global
warming.
As I pointed out in my other articles about global warming, a warmer
planet might make some areas inhospitable to us, but it would make other
areas much nicer. For all we know, we would prefer a warmer planet.
Likewise, aliens from other planets might want to help
us, not hurt us. |
|
 |
|
4) |
Craven assumes that the global warming scientists
are honest and capable of thinking properly
The people who promote the theory that aliens from other planets are
here on the earth are con artists or
lousy thinkers. Therefore, if we were to pay a global tax to stop a global
alien invasion, we would be trying to stop a nonsensical
concept.
The people who promote the theory that Arabs attacked us on September
11th can be shown to be liars or incompetent.
Therefore, if we were to attack Afghanistan and Iraq in order to stop the
Arab terrorism, we would be starting a war that could never accomplish
its goal because it would be based on a Zionist
trick.
Before we implement a global tax to stop global warming, we should take
a look at the people who promote this theory. There is a lot of evidence
that they are connected to the Zionist crime network,
and that the tax is just another trick to
extort money and manipulate us. |
|
You can trust
me because I am a scientist.
Have you seen this news article from 2007:
Scientists
warn ET may be dangerous
Should we ignore the possibility that aliens are planning
to attack us? |
