Table of contents
Page for this series
Hufschmid's main page

The Kastron Constitution

1c) Job Titles
18 March 2024



A job title should be informative

Militaries have specific titles for different jobs

Militaries do not let their members create their job title. Instead, they have specific titles for specific jobs to make it easy for the military members to understand what job a person has simply by his title. The military leadership does not care whether their members "like" their title. The military leadership does not pander to the members.

Non-military titles tend to be “emotional candy

By comparison, the non-military organizations tend to let their members create job titles. The reason we want to create our job titles is because we, especially men, have strong cravings for status. We want job titles that make us feel as if we are high in the social hierarchy. This causes us to create job titles that are emotionally titillating rather than a description of the job.

For example, a lot of men want the title of "engineer", so they have created a variety of "engineering" jobs, such as sanitation engineer, sales engineer, software engineer, and chemical engineer. This is analogous to the military allowing their members to call themselves Sanitation Colonels, Maintenance Colonels, and Kitchen Colonels.

There are even more people who want to have the title of "doctor". Millions of people describe themselves as a "Doctor" simply because they some type of school diploma, such as a Doctor of Theology, a Doctor of Divinity, a Doctor of Philosophy, a Juris Doctor, or a Doctor of Education. Furthermore, the title of Doctor of Philosophy, (PhD), doesn't tell us anything about the person's education. He might have an education in something idiotic, such as Freudian psychology.

There are so many people using the title of "Doctor" and "PhD" for different purposes that it impossible for us to know what the "doctor" in "Dr. Ruth" means.

A survey of British office workers showed that 70% of them said they would rather have a more impressive job title than an increase in their salary. The reason for this is that the social animals, especially the males, have an intense craving for status.

We have intense cravings to be important and admired, but letting people create impressive titles for themselves makes the job titles confusing. Furthermore, it encourages deception because those job titles are analogous to the false fronts of buildings. We could also describe it as putting lipstick on a pig.

We would create a more pleasant and sensible social environment if children were taught to do something impressive in order to increase their status, rather than try to impress people with false images, lies, cosmetics, and job titles.



A retard is just as retarded
with a superhero T-shirt.

Giving a person an impressive job title is as absurd as giving T-shirts with superhero logos to retarded people, as in the photo to the right.

Men have such strong cravings for status that a superhero T-shirt can fool a mentally defective man into believing that he is important and admired, but that deception is not beneficial to the defective man, or to society.

Some people justify fooling idiots and retards into believing that they are special, good-looking, and intelligent by pointing out that it increases their self-esteem and makes them feel better, but we don't know enough about the human mind to know whether that deception is truly beneficial. It is possible that the deception is detrimental by encouraging their arrogance, and by encouraging deception among the "normal" people.

What is the difference between "self-esteem" and "arrogance"? We don't know, so we should have the attitude of a scientist or engineer who is experimenting with unknown concepts, rather than assume that we know what we are doing. Specifically, when we do something to improve a person's self-esteem, we should periodically analyze the person afterwards to determine whether we have truly improved his attitude, or whether we have encouraged his arrogance.

Superhero T-shirts and impressive job titles are a form of pornography because we use them to titillate our emotions, or to impress or intimidate other people by stimulating their emotions. Unfortunately, pornography does not provide us with a better life. For example, sexual pornography allows us to titillate our emotions, but that does not improve our life.

If sexual pornography improved our lives, all of us would have discovered that when we were teenagers, and all of us would have continued stimulating ourselves with sexual pornography from that point onward.

Although there are some men who routinely stimulate themselves with sexual pornography, it is not because the pornography is improving their life. Rather, they are doing it because they are suffering from something, and they are using the pornography to bring some momentary pleasure into their miserable lives.

Giving us an impressive job title or a superhero T-shirt allows us to titillate our craving for status, thereby bringing us some momentary pleasure, and it can fool other people into admiring or praising us, and we are titillated when people admire us or praise us. However, that type of deception does not truly improve our life.

This concept applies to everything that titillates us. For example, sugar titillates us, but eating more of it will not improve our lives. An even more important concept that modern humans must understand is that after we have done a lot of work, we are titillated by being able to rest, and that can fool us into believing that if we could rest all the time and never have to work, we would have the best life of all. This results in millions of people struggling, and sometimes committing crimes, in order to become so wealthy that they can quit their job and be pampered by other people.

We must do more thinking and less masturbating

Animals spend their entire lives trying to satisfy their emotional cravings, and in the process, they find food, reproduce, and raise babies. However, humans have the intelligence and technology to bypass the purpose of our emotions and stimulate ourselves in an artificial manner, and to an excessive extent. For example:


The purpose of our sexual emotion is to make us reproduce, but we have the technology and intelligence to create sexual pornography and sex robots, thereby allowing us to titillate our sexual emotions artificially and excessively.

The men who titillate themselves with sexual pornography are not improving their lives. Rather, they are wasting a portion of their life, and the pornography can give them unrealistic expectations of women and marriage, which can interfere with their relationships and life.

Modern women titillate themselves by using technology to make themselves more beautiful, but that inadvertently stimulates men to an excess, which makes our relationships worse.


The reason men have a strong craving for status is to make us compete for leadership and women, but we can artificially stimulate that craving, and to an excessive extent, with status products, job titles, and plastic trophies.


The reason we feel hunger is to make us find food, and the reason we have the ability to taste and smell food is to make us eat the foods that are appropriate for us. However, we can now use technology to create artificial foods that are more titillating than natural foods, such as by adding enormous amounts of sugar, sodium nitrite, and MSG. Those extremely stimulating, artificial foods could be described as “food pornography”.

Stimulating ourselves with pornography can bring us some momentary pleasure, but it can also ruin our lives by giving us unrealistic attitudes and goals, and cause us to waste a portion of our very short lives. The food pornography can ruin our health if we don't design the foods to be healthy, and if we cannot refrain from eating excessive amounts.

Masturbation could be described as a form of "cheating" because it allows us to titillate our emotions without doing the work that the emotions were designed to make us do.
Job titles should be descriptive and unique

Job titles should be descriptive, not pornography

This constitution advocates the military custom of creating job titles that make it easy for us to determine what the job is. This requires that each job have a unique title, instead of allowing different jobs to have the title of "engineer" and "doctor". It requires designing job titles to be descriptive of the job, rather than to titillate us.

The military provides specific uniforms for specific jobs

The concept is similar to providing unique uniforms to police officers, firefighters, nurses, stewardesses, and pilots to allow us to identify the people with those jobs from photographs and from long distances. The people who have those jobs do not have the freedom to chose their clothing, or the pins and emblems for their clothing.

Instead, they are given uniforms, and told what type of pins or emblems to put on their uniforms. This allows us to determine what type of job a person has simply by looking at his uniform.

The military has even created Physical Training Uniforms for when their members are exercising (photo to the right).

Job titles should be as orderly as they are in the military, but the job titles should not be words that are part of our ordinary language. For example, some military titles are commonly used words, such as "Major" and "General". This can create silly situations, and which have been exploited for comedy routines, such as a comedy skit in which a man named John Payne has the title of Major.

Suggestions to start the process

This constitution specifies titles for the top two levels of government, and the top level of nongovernment organizations. Specifically, the top official in the Operations Branch has the title of President, and the top official of the Analysis Branch is a Director. Underneath them are Ministers, but the Elections Division has voters instead of ministers. The top official of a non-government organization is an Executive. A visual image of the job titles of the government is:






The ministers and executives can create job titles for their employees, but they cannot use any of the job titles that are reserved for the top positions. Therefore, they cannot refer to any of their employees as presidents, directors, executives, voters, or ministers.

When the ministers and executives create job titles, they are required to design the titles to be descriptive to help people understand what the job is, rather than to titillate people.

Also, it would be best to avoid long job titles, such as "Chief Human Resources Officer", because animals are inherently lazy in order to cause us to look for ways to accomplish a task more quickly, and that results in us abbreviating long job titles. As with the names of people, (described here), it would be best to create job titles that we don't want to abbreviate.

Job titles reserved for top leadership

Each job title should refer to a particular type of job, as is common in the military. This Constitution reserves the following job titles for top officials:

President
The top position of a division in the Operations branch, restricted to men, and elected by the voters.

Director
The top position of a division in the Analysis branch. The Women's Division is restricted to women, but the Directors of the Quality and Elections divisions are restricted to men.

Minister
The government officials who are underneath the Presidents and Directors. Available to both men and women, but men are given preference for these jobs.

Executive
The top leader of a farm, research laboratory, school, hospital, factory, restaurant, and other, non-government organization. The Executives are selected by the Ministers. Available to both men and women, but men are given preference for these jobs, except for the organizations that are restricted to women, such as the social clubs and recreational organizations that are restricted to women.

Voter
The Elections Division has "voters" rather than Ministers. Only men can become voters.

The presidents are elected by the voters

Each of the three divisions of the Operations branch have one president in control of the division. The president is elected by the voters in the Elections division of the Analysis branch.

The job title of "President" refers to the government officials that are elected by the voters. The voters elect only "presidents", not directors, ministers, executives, dentists, scientists, supervisors, or other people.

The directors are selected by their ministers

The three divisions of the Analysis branch have a director in control of the division. The ministers of the division are responsible for selecting their director.

The exception is that there are no ministers or other employees in the Elections division. The Election division is so tiny that the voters will choose one of the voters to be their director.

The executives are selected by the ministers

The Ministers in the Operations Branch determine which organizations exist, and they select somebody to be the Executive of each organization that they authorize, but they do not select any of the lower-level people in the organization, or get involved with supervising the organization. The executives are responsible for managing their organization.

The reserved job titles help us understand the jobs

The job titles that are reserved for leadership help us understand what role a person has in the management of the city. For example, we will realize that a "President" is in the Operations branch, and that he is a man who is elected by the voters, which means that the voters are responsible for selecting and firing him.

If we hear that somebody is the Director of the Women's Division, then we will know that she is a woman, and she is the top official of the Women's Division, and that she is selected and fired by the Ministers of the Women's Division, rather than by the voters.

Likewise, when we hear that somebody is an "Executive", we will know that he is the leader of a non-government organization, such as a factory, restaurant, recreational activity, courtship activity, orchestra, hospital, or research laboratory, and that he is selected and fired by one of the ministers.